Advertisement

May 19, 2013

10 Tips for When You Receive a Reservation of Rights Letter

Risk Management

Your company has just been sued. You tender the suit to your insurance company. You then get a letter in return, agreeing to defend you against the suit, but concluding with this language (in various formulations):

"Nothing herein, nor any action taken by us, including but not limited to, investigation, defense, settlement, or adjustment, shall be construed as a waiver of any right to deny coverage, and is subject to a full reservation of rights."

What are you supposed to make of that? Brace yourself. You may be facing a denial of coverage. What can you do in response? Here are ten quick tips to keep in mind:

1. Offer immediate disagreement. Write back to say you disagree and indicate you will follow up later. Avoid saying nothing, as your silence could be used against you, especially if you find this language buried in the letter: "Unless we hear otherwise, we assume you agree with our approach." 

2. Consult your own counsel immediately. If the claim is large enough, count on your insurance company looking for ways to deny it. If so, retain counsel immediately to press your claim. 

3. Request commitment before investigation. If your insurance company wants to investigate before committing to coverage, request a commitment first. You want to minimize the possibility they will build a coverage case against you.

4. Comply with all reasonable requests. You have a duty to cooperate with the insurance company in defense of the claim. If you fail to cooperate reasonably, you could lose coverage. Grant interviews; produce documents; allow on-site visits. Don't settle the claim without the insurance company's consent. Don't assume contract duties or assignments. Don't compromise the defense (such as admit liability). 

5. Give information to defense counsel only. Your insurance company's right to investigate the claim is limited to defense issues. Be sure the information they ask you for relates to defense issues, and is not being used to build a case you. If defense counsel has been appointed for you, provide information only to counsel, as that information is privileged; information you give to your insurance company may not necessarily be so protected. If you must turn over information, request a confidentiality agreement.

6. Endure the stall. You may face the "Big Stall" - a seemingly endless delay in commitment, or a replacement of one claims adjustor after another, each of whom needs to "get up to speed." Be patient and create a paper trail. Avoid the politics of appeasement. A serious attitude will effect a serious response. 

7. Avoid requests for waiver of defense costs. You may be asked to waive your right to recover your own separate defense costs as a condition of insurance company defense. Avoid signing. This was not part of your original policy bargain. If they insist, sign and declare you were acting under duress.

8. Request appointment of independent counsel. A policyholder's right to independent counsel is a matter of separate discussion, but it is often compelled by an insurer's defense under a reservation of rights. As a general rule, the more clearly you can demonstrate your defense counsel is capable of steering the defense of your case away from covered claims and toward non-covered claim, you will be able to claim this right.

9. React early and often. Evaluate your risks early. Involve your broker and the underwriter. Request face-to-face meetings with your adjustor. If they refuse your requests, document your continued need. If they claim no conflict of interest exists, highlight the conflict. Ask for their interim liability evaluation; it may demonstrate the existence of a conflict of interest. Sometimes you can wear them down. 

10. Demonstrate conflict with panel counsel. This advice is not for the squeamish. To the extent your insurance company puts you at increased risk, write to your appointed defense counsel and ask for protection against liability for non-covered claims. Document conflicts of interest you perceive. Ask counsel to provide you with proof of malpractice coverage limits. Your requests are legitimate, however annoying. Your counsel is subject to ethical restraints that your insurance company is not, and which may at last compel protection of your rights.

Written by David Shaneyflet. David A. Shaneyfelt is a partner in the Ventura, California office of Anderson Kill & Olick, where he concentrates his practice in the area of insurance recovery, exclusively on behalf of policyholders.  

The above article is reprinted from the May 2010 edition of Risk Management Magazine.

Reprinted with permission from Risk Management Magazine. Copyright 2010 Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Risk Management Magazine  is the premier source of analysis, insight and news for corporate risk managers. RM strives to explore existing and emerging techniques and concepts that address the needs of those who are tasked with protecting the physical, financial, human and intellectual assets of their companies. As the business world and the world at large change with increasing speed, RM keeps its readers informed about new challenges and solutions....

212-286-9364

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.