July 28, 2014

$200 Million in Energy Efficiency Funding, Obama Proposes

President Barack Obama will propose $200 million in his next budget for a “Race to the Top” program rewarding states that pursue energy efficiency, asking Congress to put teeth on an initiative to help the US use less electricity.

Mr. Obama’s mentioned the idea in Tuesday’s State of the Union address but didn’t outline a dollar figure or other specifics. The budget proposal is expected next month.

The proposal would be modeled after a similar effort that gave states funding for implementing education reforms, according to a summary provided by a White House official. That program rewarded states who made policy changes in line with the Obama administration’s priorities.

The proposed energy-efficiency funding would “support state governments that implement effective policies to cut energy waste,” specifically measures such as modernizing utility rules and building codes to encourage efficiency and standardizing financing for energy-efficiency upgrades, the summary said.

The White House official said Congress would have to vote to fund the initiative, but the administration believes it can work with lawmakers to implement the new effort under existing law, without authorizing any new programs.

The idea is part of a wider push in favor of energy-efficient buildings, which could help achieve Mr. Obama’s climate change goals by resulting in less greenhouse gas emissions from burning coal or natural gas to make electricity.

“I’m also issuing a new goal for America: Let’s cut in half the energy wasted by our homes and businesses over the next 20 years,” Mr. Obama said Tuesday.

Susan Tierney, who helped author a series of recommendations released last week by the Alliance to Save Energy, a nonprofit group that promotes energy efficiency policy, said the “Race to the Top” funding could be attractive to states.

“Right now the energy efficiency opportunities are massive within all of these states but they also have a lot of other challenges around their economic conditions,” Ms. Tierney said.

Business engaged in energy-efficiency retrofits applauded the proposals, but said it was important to back them up with action.

“Mandates and requirements will be absolutely essential if the administration is serious about cutting energy waste in half,” said Dave Myers, president of building efficiency for Johnson Controls.

Mr. Myers and others are also focused on another of the president’s goals: in December 2011, the White House directed federal agencies to close $2 billion worth of contracts for energy-saving upgrades on federal buildings within two years.

Paul Orzeske, president of the building solutions unit of Honeywell International, said the administration was in danger of falling behind that goal if it doesn’t finish the process of selecting contractors by this summer at the latest. The president is sending “the right message,” he said, “but at a working level you have to get it through the system.”

©1994-2014 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Jordin Collins, government relations, Mintz levin law firm
Director of Government Relations

Jordan advises clients on issues surrounding clean energy investments, capital markets, and technology commercialization as well as on federal and state policy developments in these areas.

Before joining ML Strategies, Jordan worked for SRA, Inc. as a consultant to the US Department of Energy in both the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy and the Office of Policy and International Affairs. In his capacity as a policy and regulatory analyst, Jordan researched and drafted memoranda analyzing clean energy regulatory, tax, market, trade, and financial issues on behalf of...


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.