Advertisement

April 23, 2014

2013 Brings Significant Criminal Background Check Changes for Ohio Home Health Agencies "HHAs"

The Ohio Department of Health has proposed new administrative rules scheduled to take effect January 1, 2013 that will significantly impact the obligations of a home health agency (“HHA”) regarding background checks of its current and potential employees. 

Currently, HHAs are required to request the Superintendent of the Bureau of Criminal Identification and Investigation (“BCII”) to conduct background checks on employment applicants. The current rules list “disqualifying offenses” that prohibit an HHA from hiring an offending applicant and also contain some exceptions to the obligation to check an applicant’s background. The new rules, although containing the same general scheme of regulation, alter the specifics of that scheme drastically. 

Effective with the new rules, HHAs must conduct criminal background checks on applicants before hiring and on all employees at least once every five years. HHAs must initially check current employees hired prior to January 1, 2008 no later than thirty days after the anniversary of the employee’s date of hire and employees hired on or after January 1, 2008 no later than thirty days after the fifth anniversary of the date of hire. Prior to conducting the required checks, the chief administrator of an HHA must check six specified electronic databases, ranging from the Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General exclusion database to the database of inmates maintained by the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction. 

The new rules also enhance the list of “disqualifying offenses” and provide a tiered exclusionary period system based on the offense committed. The current rules contain a list of approximately fifty disqualifying offenses for HHA employees providing direct care to a child and another list of approximately fifty-five offenses for HHA employees providing direct care to an older adult. The new rules contain a single list of approximately one hundred twenty-seven offenses for HHA employees providing direct care to any individual. The new rules also fix permanent, ten-year, seven-year, five-year, and no-time exclusionary periods. For the duration of the specified period, an HHA may not employ or continue to employ an individual providing direct care who committed or pled guilty to an offense enumerated under each time period. 

HHA chief administrators continue to have express obligations under the new rules, similar to the current regime. Administrators must provide each applicant and employee forms and fingerprint impression sheets, obtain the completed forms and impression sheets, and forward them to the superintendent of the BCII. Also, administrators must, like the current rule, maintain documentation of compliance, which includes maintaining a roster of applicants and employees with the name of each applicant and employee, the date the criminal record check request is submitted to the BCII, the date the criminal records check request is received from the BCII, a determination of whether the results yield any disqualifying offenses, and the date the employee starts work. 

Finally, the new rules alter the definition of “direct care,” which will include skilled nursing care, physical therapy, speech-language pathology, occupational therapy, medical social services, and home health aide services provided in a patient’s home. It further includes any activity that requires the person performing the activity to be routinely alone with the patient or routinely have access to a patient’s personal or financial documents. The new rule also broadens the term by applying it to “a patient” rather than merely “an older adult” as under the current rule. 

To be sure, the new rule imposes fresh and perhaps onerous obligations on HHAs and their administrators. The new rules are expected to take effect on January 1, 2013.

© 2013 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Annually appearing on The Best Lawyers in America list, as well as the Ohio Super Lawyers list, Tom has over 30 years of experience representing health care providers before state, federal and administrative courts across the country. He is the Practice Group Leader for the Government Relations and Health Law Practice Groups.

Leveraging extensive experience with a thorough understanding of the issues facing the health care industry, Tom takes a practical, yet aggressive approach to help clients meet their needs while also mitigating risk. Within the constantly-...

(614) 227-4260

About the Author

Associate

A member of the Corporate Department and Health Care Practice Group, Tyler has experience handling a variety of health care matters. Understanding that the health care industry is constantly evolving, Tyler places a premium on staying abreast of new developments and communicating them to clients. He drafts a monthly newsletter for health care clients, detailing new legislation and newsworthy health care issues, both to keep clients informed and enable them to take a proactive approach toward handling and resolving issues. He also has worked with health care providers regarding reporting...

(304) 357-9939

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.