May 17, 2012

The 5 Steps of a Cybersecurity Risk Assessment

Risk Management - RIMS

Today's organizations are constantly bombarded with cybersecurity threats. IT managers frequently lose sleep over botnets, malware, worms and hacking. Rather than reach for a sleep aid, organizations need a clear methodology for prioritizing and addressing cybersecurity risks. Here are five clear steps to develop a solid foundation for a security strategy.

1. Identify Information Assets  
Consider primary types of information that the organization handles (e.g., social security numbers, payment card numbers, patient records, designs) and make a priority list of what needs to be protected.  

2. Locate Information Assets 
Identify and list where each item on the information asset list resides (e.g., file servers, workstations, laptops, removable media, PDAs and phones, databases). 

3. Classify Information Assets
Assign a rating to your information asset list. Consider a 1-5 priority scale, with the following categories: (1) public information, (2)  internal, but not secret, information, (3) sensitive internal information, (4) compartmentalized internal information, and (5) regulated information. This type of classification allows the organization to rank information assets based on the amount of harm that would be caused if the information was disclosed or altered. 

4. Conduct a Threat Modeling Exercise  
Rate the threats that the top-rated information assets face. One option is to use Microsoft's S.T.R.I.D.E. method, which is simple, clear and covers most of the top threats. Develop a spreadsheet for each asset, listing the following S.T.R.I.D.E. categories: 

Spoofing of identity
Tampering with data
Repudiation of transactions
Information disclosure
Denial of service
Elevation of privilege    

In the spreadsheet, list the data locations identified in Step 2. For each cell, make estimates of both the probability of this threat actually being carried out against the asset at the location in question and the impact that a successful exploitation of a weakness would have on the organization. Use a 1-10 scale in which 1 is "not very likely" and "minimal impact" and 10 is "quite probable" or "catastrophic." Then multiply those two numbers together and put the total for each location into cells. The spreadsheet should be populated with numbers from 1 to 100. 

5. Finalize Data and Start Planning 
Multiply the total in each cell in all the worksheets by the classification ranking assigned to the asset in Step 3. The final total will give you a rational and comprehensive ranking of all the cyber threats posed to the organization's information. A reasonable security plan will start by tackling the risks with the highest totals and then assign a lower priority to mitigating those with lower totals. In an ideal world, you will find a way to lessen all your risks-but be sure to take care of the big threats first.

___________

Written by Peyton Engel:

Peyton Engel is a data security expert at CDW, a leading supplier of technology products and services to business, government and educational institutions.

Risk Management Magazine and Risk Management Monitor. Copyright 2010 Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Risk Management Magazine  is the premier source of analysis, insight and news for corporate risk managers. RM strives to explore existing and emerging techniques and concepts that address the needs of those who are tasked with protecting the physical, financial, human and intellectual assets of their companies. As the business world and the world at large change with increasing speed, RM keeps its readers informed about new challenges and solutions....

212-286-9364

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.