May 17, 2012

Abercrombie & Fitch Immigration Fine: A Lesson for Employers

On September 28, 2010, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced that it was fining clothing retailer Abercrombie & Fitch  $1.05 million for violations of its obligation to verify the employment eligibility of its workers. The settlement was the result of an audit of the  I-9 records for Abercrombie & Fitch’s retail stores in Michigan. The audit uncovered numerous deficiencies in the company’s process for completing and retaining its I-9 records. “Employers are responsible not only for the people they hire but also for the internal systems they choose to utilize to manage their employment process, and those systems must result in effective compliance,” said Brian M. Moskowitz, special agent in charge of ICE’s Office of Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) in Ohio and Michigan. “This settlement should serve as a warning to other companies that may not yet take the employment verification process seriously or provide it the attention it warrants.”  The ICE press release indicated that these fines were levied despite the fact that the government discovered no evidence that the company employed unauthorized workers.

Employers must complete and retain an I-9 Form for each individual they hire for employment in the United States, regardless of whether the worker is a U.S. citizen or foreign national.  This process requires employers to review and record each employee’s identity and employment eligibility documents. Failure to comply with I-9 requirements may result in sizeable fines and/or charges of criminal misconduct.

The I-9 inspections are the result of the Obama Administration’s strategy to reduce the demand for illegal immigrant employment and protect employment opportunities for the nation’s lawful workforce. Under this strategy, ICE is focusing its resources on worksite audits and investigations.  In the past year, ICE has leveled a record number of civil and criminal penalties against employers who violate immigration laws related to the I-9 process, which were established by the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986.

Employers should ensure that their immigration compliance policies, I-9 preparation/retention processes and I-9 records are up to date in order to make sure they are in compliance with the law and to avoid liability. 

© 2012 Vedder Price

About the Author

Shareholder

Gabrielle M. Buckley is a shareholder in the firm’s Corporate Practice Area. Ms. Buckley has over 25 years of experience counseling U.S.- and foreign-based companies with regard to all aspects of employment-related immigration laws. She advises employers as to immigration law issues arising in corporate mergers, acquisitions, divestitures and other forms of corporate reorganization. Ms. Buckley assists clients in obtaining temporary and permanent immigration status in virtually every immigration category. She develops immigration compliance policies for employers and...

312-609-7626

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.