May 17, 2012

Accommodation Do’s and Don’ts

Dinsmore & Shohl LLP

A great deal of information has been presented about the changes to the Americans With Disabilities Act through the ADA Amendments Act (“ADAAA”) as well as what to expect from the implementation of the new regulations expected later this year.  However, how do you as an employer deal with everyday issues that arise when attempting to determine whether a reasonable accommodation is required?  What should you be saying, or not saying, to employees requesting accommodations? Below is a tip list of do’s and don’ts that offers some guidance in these situations.

DO’s
 

  • Update Job Descriptions To Ensure Accuracy As To Essential Functions Of Job
  • Review The Job Description With The Employee
  • Ask Open-Ended Questions To Identify Accommodations Needed To Perform Essential Functions Of Job
  • Inform Employee That You May Need Additional Information From His Or Her Physician
  • Encourage Ideas From Employee, Physician And Industry Sources As To Possible Accommodations – This Is An Interactive Process
  • Remind Employee Of Responsibilities To Adhere To Company Policies And Performance Expectations
  • Provide Information To Others Strictly On A “Need To Know” Basis
  • Document Both Sides Of Conversation And Accommodations Offered And Made
  • Discuss How Process Works And Provide Timeframe For Responding, Including Who Will Be Involved In Process

DONT’S

  • Don’t Express Opinions Such As: “You’re Not Disabled” Or “This Is Such A Hassle,” Or “You’re Costing Us A Fortune!” Or “The Company Will Never Pay For That”
  • Don’t Promise Before You Are Certain
  • Don’t Give Up Simply Because First Idea Did Not Work
  • Don’t Store Employee Health Information With Personnel Files
  • Don’t Provide Supervisors Direct Access To Employee Health Information
  • Don’t Communicate Directly With Employee’s Doctor(s)
  • Don’t Be Afraid To Document Performance Issues Unrelated To The Disability

Hopefully with these tips, you can open a dialogue with your employee that will lead to a mutually satisfactory solution or, if no solution can be found, at least the employee will feel he or she has been dealt with fairly.

© 2009 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Laurie Kemp is a Partner in the Labor and Employment Department. She practices primarily in the areas of employment law and workers’ compensation and provides employment advice, policy reviews, trainings and investigation assistance to employers. She has represented clients in defending state and federal employment lawsuits stemming from harassment, wrongful termination, Title VII, ADA, FMLA and ADEA as well as for breaches of non-competition and employment agreements. Laurie's practice also includes responding to and participating in agency investigations and...

502-581-8063

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.