Advertisement

May 21, 2013

ACGME Announces its Next Accreditation System

On February 22, 2012, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) announced the roll-out of its “Next Accreditation System” (NAS) for all graduate medical education (residency and fellowship) programs that hold ACGME accreditation.  The ACGME, the accrediting agency for approximately 9,000 residency programs in 133 specialties and subspecialties across the country, anticipates that the NAS will significantly transform the existing accreditation system into a more outcomes-focused and less administratively burdensome process.  

According to the ACGME, the NAS will: 

  • replace the process of site visits and program evaluations every several years with periodic data submissions to the ACGME that include the reporting of outcomes through the educational milestones, the resident survey, a new faculty survey, and operative/case log data;
  • require RRCs to evaluate trends in key performance measures annually, and extend the maximum accreditation cycle from 5 years to 10 years;
  • eliminate the Program Information Form (PIF), which will be replaced with a “self-study” or “self-evaluation” to be completed before the 10-year site visit; and
  • place greater emphasis on the responsibility of the sponsoring institution for the quality and safety of the teaching and patient care environment, which will be monitored through periodic institutional site visits.

The educational milestones referenced above are essentially the next step in what started as the ACGME’s outcomes project, which created the 6 general competencies that have been part of the ACGME framework for more than 10 years.  The “milestones project” represents the specialty-specific achievements that residents and fellows will be expected to demonstrate at various points throughout their training.  In this regard, the ACGME has continued its shift in emphasis from having programs state in their PIFs what they will teach their trainees to do, to requiring that programs demonstrate that their trainees have actually achieved competence in those areas. 

The announcement and more details about the NAS can be found on the newly created ACGME NAS microsite and in the New England Journal of Medicine article entitled “The Next GME Accreditation System – Rationale and Benefits,” by Thomas J. Nasca, M.D., M.A.C.P. (ACGME CEO), et al.,published on February 22, 2012.  Written by Andrew B. Roth and Nili S. Yolin

©1994-2013 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Member

Andy is a Member in the firm’s Health Law Section. Before joining Mintz Levin, he was the partner-in-charge of the New York health law practice of another AmLaw 100 firm.

212-692-6889

About the Author

Of Counsel

Nili is Of Counsel in the firm’s Health Law Section. She focuses her practice on complex transactions, regulatory compliance, and graduate medical education matters.

212-692-6799

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.