May 17, 2012

Adjusting to China's Role in Global Hospitality

Ross Woods of Hotel Investment Strategies says that Americans may need to pay much more attention to the ever growing role of China in the hospitality business in particular and in the global economy generally.  Perhaps this awareness began in 2009 when Keck Seng Investments of Hong Kong bought the W Hotel San Francisco.   It then took center stage last March when the joint venture between Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels Company Limited and Thayer Lodging Group  completed  its merger with Interstate Hotels & Resorts.  Other significant recent transactions to drive home the point include American Pacific International Capital’s acquisition of a hotel portfolio in San Francisco’s SoMa district and two boutique hotels in its NoMa district, as well as Shenzhen New World Group Co., Ltd buying the Marriott Los Angeles Downtown and Sheraton Universal City.  In 2011, so far, Cheng Yu-tung of Hong Kong has been acquiring assets such as the Carlyle Hotel in Manhattan,  Rosewood’s Crescent in Dallas and Little Dix Bay in the British Virgin Islands.

We see this happening around us, and like many, are seeking good opportunities for our clients.  In my recent chat with Ross Woods we concluded that the trend is early in its cycle and that there will be continuing opportunities in the years ahead.

For more insights on China see the recent HVS article by Li Chen or find Ross Woods at  ross.woods@hotelinvestmentstrategies.com.

©2012 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Shareholder

Nelson F. Migdal focuses his practice on hotel acquisitions, operations, development and finance, large mixed-use projects, condo hotels, hotel management agreements, general commercial real estate acquisitions, commercial leasing, lender representation, and the representation of property owners on telecommunications matters.

202-331-3180

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.