May 17, 2012

All Aboard! Accelerated Examination Plan Gets Expansion and Extension

The director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), David Kappos, appears to have listened to feedback from large entities wanting to take advantage of the Project Exchange program ("Program").1  On May 17, 2010, Director Kappos announced that the Program will be expanded to include all applicants and will be extended until December 31, 2010. Click here to read the USPTO's Press Release. The Program was open previously only to small entity applicants and was set to expire June 30, 2010. If the general guidelines of the Program remain unchanged from those in previous versions of the Program, all applicants will be able to petition to make an application special and have it advance to the front of the examination queue provided the applicant expressly abandons a co-pending application.2 Thus, a patent application may be examined sooner by the USPTO, and consequently a patent may issue sooner under the Program than under normal procedures. 

One notable limitation that was added under the expanded Program, according to the USPTO's press release, is that the Program will be limited initially to 15 applications per entity. The USPTO soon will make available additional details on the expanded Program in the Federal Register and on the USPTO web site. 

As we noted previously, the expansion to include all applicants as well as the extension of time may further increase the chances that Director Kappos' goals of acceleration and backlog reduction will be achieved by increasing the number of applicants that qualify under the Program and by providing additional time to opt into the program.3

Please stand-by as we keep you updated on future developments in this backlog reduction area.

________________________

1 The "Project Exchange" program was referred to previously as the Patent Application Backlog Reduction Stimulus Plan.

2 The abandoned application must have either common ownership or a common inventor and must have been pending at the time of the implementation of this program.

3 Extended Voyage: Accelerate Examination Plan Gets an Extension. For more background on the plan see Clearing the Shipping Lanes: Reduce Backlog to Accelerate Examination.

About the Author

Partner

Jeffrey Whittle has experience representing clients in various technology-based transactions, including licenses, agreements for technology development, transfer, acquisition, joint development, collaboration, product development, strategic alliance, collaboration, and product distribution, as well as various other intellectual property agreements in the software, telecommunications, mechanical/electrical, e-commerce, financial, energy and medical industries.

Mr. Whittle also has experience representing clients in various patent, trademark,...

713-221-1185

Contributors

Associate

Michael Hay is an associate in the Intellectual Property Practice Group in the Houston office of Bracewell and Giuliani. Mr. Hay focuses his practice on U.S. and foreign patent prosecution, licensing, client counseling and opinion preparation.  In addition, Mr. Hay frequently counsels clients with respect to trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, and internet domain names. 

Mr. Hay has experience representing clients in a wide range of intellectual property issues focused on protecting, creating, enhancing and enforcing intellectual property...

713-221-1439

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.