Advertisement

May 20, 2013

All Employers May be Required to Post NLRB Notice of Union Organizing Rights

The National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") has issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that would require all Employers subject to the National Labor Relations Act to post "Notices" physically and electronically.

In a proposed rule issued on December 22, 2010, the NLRB requires all Employers to post 11 by 17 inch Notices and e-mail employees (where the Employer customarily communicates with employees by such means) a Notice identifying the statutory rights of employees to organize unions. The NLRB intends to punish all Employers who fail to make the required postings through their unfair labor practice process.

The Notices explain the statutory protections under the National Labor Relations Act for employees who desire to form unions. The Notices will not only inform employees of their rights, wrote the NLRB, but will also dissuade Employers from violating those rights.

Employers subject to the National Labor Relations Act are the vast majority of private sector Employers. Examples of Employers outside of this class are federal, state, county and municipal employees, common carrier employees (such as railway and airline workers) and certain agricultural employees. Virtually all other employees, and Employers, are within the jurisdiction of the NLRB regardless of whether or not the employees have previously determined to unionize.

The proposed rule would necessarily alter the NLRB's statute of limitations and fact-finding process. The NLRB expressly anticipates bringing claims against non-complying Employers after the statutory 6 month statute of limitations tolls where the charging party (typically an employee) has no previous understanding of the statutory limitation on actions. Moreover, the NLRB anticipates that the failure of an Employer to post the Notices as required will presumptively establish "anti-union" animus, or motive, making it easier to bring claims against that Employer on other matters.

The sole Republican on the NLRB, Brian Hayes, dissented from the Order. Member Hayes wrote "... the Board lacks the statutory authority to promulgate or enforce the type of rule which the petitions contemplated and which the proposed rule makes explicit."

The NLRB will entertain public comment on the proposed rule for a 60 day period, after which it will begin enforcing the rule or make revisions for further comments. There is also a remote possibility it will decide not to enact the rule.

© 2013 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Mark Carter is a Labor Partner with a national practice. Mark advises clients on all aspects of traditional labor and employment law. He has extensive experience in litigating before the federal trial and appellate courts, the National Labor Relations Board, arbitrations, and in collective bargaining. Mark has also litigated numerous damage actions involving strike misconduct under the RICO Act and other federal labor laws in Alaska, Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Michigan, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas,...

304-357-0924

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.