Advertisement

April 17, 2014

Amendments to Russian Civil Code Related to Immovable Property

Amended code, including provisions on state registration and notes of objection, will take effect on 1 March.

On 30 December 2012, President of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin approved proposed amendments to the Russian Civil Code by signing Federal Law No. 302-FZ, "On amending Chapters 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Part 1 of the Russian Federation Civil Code" (Law), which will take effect on 1 March 2013.

After lengthy deliberations, the Law is less radical than initially proposed.[1] For example, the proposal to subject all real estate transactions to notarization was rejected. The rule remains the same as before—unless otherwise specifically required by law or agreed to by the affected parties, all real estate transactions must be in simple written form.

Importantly, the Law provides that only the property ownership rights of a particular person, or liens or encumbrances, shall be subject to state registration in cases required by law. Accordingly, state registration will no longer be required for certain contracts involving real property; these include agreements for the sale or lease of an enterprise, sale of residential property, gift of real property, or lease agreements for a term exceeding 364 days. Instead, the party acquiring rights to real property will need to register its ownership, leasehold, or lien or encumbrance over the property. To implement these changes, certain amendments to Federal Law No. 122-FZ, "On State Registration of Rights to Immovable Property and Transactions," may be required, followed by corresponding revisions to the procedures for state registration.

Another novelty introduced by the Law is the concept of a note of objection. A person who previously had registered rights to real property may request that the Unified State Register of Legal Entities record a "note of objection" in respect to the rights of any other persons who have been registered for the same property. Such a note of objection will be valid for three months but will then be removed if the complaining person has not filed a lawsuit within this period. Because it does not prevent a registered owner from selling or leasing the property immediately, such a note of objection appears to be mainly designed to warn prospective buyers or lessees that there is a potential dispute.


[1]. Most of the amendments proposed at the first hearing were dismissed.

Copyright © 2014 by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

International Partner

Dmitry Kunitsa is an international partner in Morgan Lewis's Business and Finance Practice. Mr. Kunitsa regularly handles real estate development, investment projects, and nearly all types of contemporary real estate transactions. He also has experience in the hospitality and sports/entertainment industries.

+7 495 212 2505

About the Author

Associate

Ekaterina Tsvetkova is an associate in Morgan Lewis's Business and Finance Practice. Ms. Tsvetkova advises on legal matters related to residential and warehouse property lease and sublease, lease registration and termination, mortgage, registration and termination, related out of court procedures, and a variety of other matters arising in the context of real estate transactions.

+7 495 212 2546

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.