May 17, 2012

American Laser Centers To Pay $125,000 To Settle Sexual Harassment And Retaliation Suit By EEOC

Nation’s Largest Laser Hair Removal Company Allowed Harassment of Female Staff in Fresno and Fired Manager Who Complained, Federal Agency Charged

FRESNO, Calif. –  American Laser Centers (ALC), the largest laser hair removal company in the  U.S., will pay $125,000 and furnish other relief to settle claims of sexual  harassment and retaliation at its site in Fresno, Calif., resolving a lawsuit  filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the federal agency  announced today.

According to the original lawsuit, female  staff at the company’s clinic in Fresno  charged that they were sexually harassed since at least 2006 by the landlord  for the facility in question. The women,  including a clinic manager, faced frequent harassment which included leering,  unwelcome touching, sexual advances and appearances in their work area by the visibly  aroused landlord The harassment got to the point where one  female employee felt compelled to bring her brother to work as a measure of  protection.

The clinic manager and others reported  the harassment to ALC district management in 2006, expressing fear of working  with the landlord. The women’s fears  were met with a superficial internal investigation with no finding of  wrongdoing on the part the landlord and continued exposure to their feared  harasser. The female clinic manager was fired just a week and a half after  reporting the misconduct.

The EEOC originally filed suit in  January 2010 in the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California (EEOC v. American Laser Centers LLC, Case  No. 1:09-CV-02247-AWI-DLB), arguing that the company’s failure to appropriately  address the harassment of all the women, and the retaliatory discharge suffered  by the manager who complained, violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of  1964. Title VII also prohibits employers  from permitting third parties to harass their employees. A three-year consent decree reached by both  parties effectively settles the suit for $125,000 in backpay and compensatory  damages for distress suffered by the four female targets.

The consent decree also calls for  injunctive relief to correct and prevent future instances of harassment,  discrimination and retaliation at American  Laser Center  clinics in and around the company’s bay area region, which encompasses Fresno, Calif. Requirements include implementing anti-harassment and anti-retaliation policies  and complaint procedures; annual compliance training for staff; designation of  an internal EEO officer; holding managers accountable for engaging in such  misconduct; posting an EEOC notice on the matter; and, reports on the handling  of such complaints to the EEOC.

“We encourage employers to be  vigilant about addressing complaints of harassment by third parties as well as  employees,” said Anna Y. Park, regional attorney for the EEOC’s Los Angeles  District Office, which includes Fresno  in its jurisdiction. “Proactive action  is important to prevent liability.”

Melissa Barrios, director of the EEOC’s Fresno Local  Office, added, “Workers absolutely have the legal right to report harassment or  discrimination suffered at work without repercussion. Employers who encourage such open  communication can tackle civil rights abuses earlier on, thereby creating a  more harmonious workplace and minimizing liability.”

According to its website, American Laser Centers is the nation’s  largest and leading provider of laser-based skincare services, including laser  hair removal, cellulite reduction and skin rejuvenation treatments. The company began operations in 2002 and  currently operates over 150 clinics nationwide.

The EEOC enforces federal laws  prohibiting employment discrimination.  Further information about the EEOC is available on the agency’s web site  atwww.eeoc.gov.

© Copyright 2012 - U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

About the Author

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is responsible for enforcing federal laws that make it illegal to discriminate against a job applicant or an employee because of the person's race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information. It is also illegal to discriminate against a person because the person complained about discrimination, filed a charge of discrimination, or participated in an employment discrimination investigation or lawsuit.

Most employers with at least 15...

800-669-4000

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.