Advertisement

April 15, 2014

Antitrust in Transition - What to Look for in a Second Obama Administration

In 2008, then-candidate Obama promised invigorated antitrust enforcement in his administration. As President, he kept that promise. The Justice Department's Antitrust Division successfully blocked high-profile mergers like AT&T/T-Mobile; challenged Apple and several publishers regarding e-book pricing; and obtained record fines and jail sentences in settlements in the ongoing auto parts investigations. One of its first actions was to withdraw guidelines on monopolization issued by its predecessors; however, any expected flood of such cases never materialized. The independent Federal Trade Commission (FTC) also was re-invigorated and aggressively pursued several hospital mergers and so-called "pay for delay" arrangements by brand name drug companies while investigating high-profile companies like Google. A second Obama administration is likely to continue these efforts, although with different leaders at the agencies.

At the DOJ's Antitrust Division, Bill Baer has been nominated for the new Assistant Attorney General and approval from the full Senate is expected soon, perhaps even during the current lame-duck session. Baer is well-known and respected by all parts of the antitrust community. As head of the FTC's Bureau of Competition in the 1990s, he led successful challenges to the merger of Staples/Office Depot and the conduct of Toys R Us. As head of the antitrust group at Arnold & Porter LLP, Baer has represented companies like General Electric, Cisco and Intel in their dealings with U.S. and foreign antitrust officials. He will be a familiar face to competition lawyers around the globe and his confirmation testimony gave no indication of changes from recent Antitrust Division enforcement.

At the FTC, professor Josh Wright of George Mason University Law School has been nominated to replace Tom Rosch as one of two Republican Commissioners. Rosch advocated for more aggressive antitrust enforcement by the FTC than had been expected and, in most cases, supported FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz's renewed use of FTC Act Section 5. Wright has been a prolific writer on many antitrust topics and has criticized several recent actions by the FTC, especially its recent use of Section 5's "unfair methods of competition" cause of action. Wright's confirmation hearings have not yet been scheduled, but, if confirmed, he is likely to push to rein in some of the FTC's recent antitrust pursuits.

FTC Chairman Leibowitz has said he expects to leave the Commission in the coming months, although no date has been set and no replacement has been named. His replacement as Commissioner could be named Chairman, or one of the other Democratic Commissioners, Julie Brill or Edith Ramirez, could ascend to that position. The departure of Leibowitz and Rosch might bring a reduced emphasis on pure Section 5 cases but otherwise is unlikely to drastically change the FTC's antitrust or consumer protection agendas. Chairman Leibowitz has indicated a strong desire for the Commission to make a decision before the end of the year regarding its long-running investigation of Google. Media reports indicate that FTC staff is recommending filing suit over Internet search and smartphone patent actions taken by the company.

© 2014 Schiff Hardin LLP

About the Author

Since our involvement in the famous Electrical Equipment cases in the early 1960s, Schiff Hardin has been one of the leading antitrust firms in the United States, on the forefront of defending clients against antitrust claims. Our many decades of experience include:

Antitrust and trade regulation counseling
Civil antitrust litigation
Criminal antitrust investigations and prosecutions

We have taken major responsibility in antitrust grand jury investigations and in resulting criminal prosecutions under the antitrust laws, as well as in nationwide civil treble damage...

734-222-1506

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.