February 8, 2012

Attention West Virginia County Boards of Education: Is "Proof" Required for Utilizing Charter Buses?

Many school systems utilize private charter buses for school-sponsored activities for several reasons. One of which comes to mind is the additional comfort provided to students for lengthy field trips or student athletic events. In 2007, the West Virginia State Legislature amended the West Virginia Code to require certain verifications from these private charter companies before those companies could transport more than 16 students. Specifically, West Virginia Code § 18-5-13(f)(6) provides that students may not be transported to school-sponsored activities in a vehicle that has a seating capacity of 16 or more passengers which is not owned or operated by the county board of education unless the vehicle meets certain insurance, safety and related requirements.

According to West Virginia Code § 18-5-13(f)(6)(B), the transportation company which operates the private charter buses “shall provide to the county board proof that the vehicle and the driver satisfy the requirements of the State Board rule.” Unfortunately, the law does not provide any real guidance as to what “proof” is required. Instead, the Legislature in 2007 directed that the West Virginia State Board of Education (“State Board”) to "promulgate rules", and provide additional guidance. To that end, the State Board adopted Policy 4336 in October of 2008. But Policy 4336 simply mirrors the West Virginia Code language.

What "proof" is a county board of education required to obtain to meet this requirement?

The Legislature and the State Board have not provided formal guidance and many county boards of education are left to guess as to the necessary “proof” required before allowing private charter companies to transport students. Recently, the West Virginia School Service Personnel Association (“WVSSPA”) filed a civil action against the Monongalia County Board of Education (“MCBOE”) over this very issue. The MCBOE, among other times, was utilizing a charter bus company to transport student athletes for summer football practice from the old high school where dressing facilities were, to the new high school that would be opening at the beginning of the term (but the new high school did not have dressing facilities). The WVSSPA alleged that the MCBOE was not obtaining sufficient "proof", and of course the MCBOE asserted that in fact it had obtained sufficient "proof".

The case was ultimately resolved with an agreement being reached between the WVSSPA and the MCBOE as to what “proof” would be required to comply with the applicable West Virginia Code and State Policy. That agreement, signed by all parties, and entered by the Circuit Court of Monongalia County, can be viewed by clicking here.

Many county boards of education have been hesitant to utilize charter buses until the civil action in Monongalia County was concluded. That agreement, reached between the WVSSPA and the MCBOE, may serve as a guide to those counties, given that the West Virginia Code and State Policy are silent on “proof”. With the agreement reached and some guidance for county school systems to avoid conflict with the WVSSPA, hopefully that hesitation will ease and counties can once again go back to making decisions they believe are in the best interest of students. These decisions often include the use of private charter transportation for school-sponsored activities.
 

© 2012 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Jason's practice concentrates on two areas of law that are quite diverse from each other. One area of Jason’s practice focuses on enforcing the collection rights and security interests of creditors. In this area of the law, he also has experience in defending creditors and debt collection entities in litigation where claims have been asserted against such entities for alleged violations of the West Virginia Consumer Credit and Protect Act (“WVCCPA”) and/or the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. In addition, he has experience in defending automobile manufacturers...

304-225-1417

About the Author

Associate

Matt Nelson is a member of the Labor and Employment Department. He focuses his practice on both general and employment litigation. Matt has defended employers in wrongful discharge actions, discrimination actions, and wage/hour actions. He counsels employers and delivers presentations on compliance with state and federal labor and employment law. Matt is also a member of the Natural Resources Practice Group, and regulalry represents clients against the U.S. Department of Labor and the Mine Safety and Health Administration.

304-225-1421

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.