Advertisement

May 20, 2013

Attorneys’ Fees Awarded in Consumers Energy Discrimination Case

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan recently awarded over $700,000 in attorneys' fees and expenses to a successful plaintiff in a recent high-profile sexual discrimination case.

Waldo v. Consumers Energy (No. 1:06-cv-768) involved a female utility worker's claim for sexual-harassment, hostile work environment against her employer, Consumers Energy.  The case was tried twice to verdict in front of West Michigan juries, and at the conclusion of the second trial, a jury awarded the plaintiff $7.9 million in compensatory and punitive damages.  The judgment was later remitted to the statutory damages cap of $300,000.

The Court's recent opinion dealt with plaintiff's request for statutory attorneys' fees and costs under 42 U.S.C. § 1988.  Applying the lodestar method and the Johnson factors, the Court awarded Plaintiff's request nearly in full.  It found that the number of hours spent on the case—over 1900 hours of attorney time—was not unreasonable given the case's complexity and five-year duration.  The Court also held that the hourly rates charged were reasonable for attorneys with comparable skill and experience in the Grand Rapids, Michigan area:  $400 per hour for lead counsel; $200 per hour for an associate attorney; $150 per hour for law clerks; and $100 per hour for paralegals.

Additionally, the Court declined defendant's invitation to reduce the fee award on the basis of her unsuccessful gender discrimination and retaliation claims.  Because those claims involved a common core of facts with the successful hostile work environment claim and were based on related legal theories, the Court found the proposed reduction "unwarranted."

© 2013 Varnum LLP

About the Author

Associate

Stephen is an associate in the trial group where he focuses his practice on federal court litigation.

616/336-6952

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.