May 21, 2012

Bank of America, which spent $4 billion to buy Countrywide, now must pay $8.5 billion settlement to Countrywide investors

Billion-dollar settlement  - Bank of America Corp. today announced a huge $8.5 billion settlement with two dozen big investors who lost money on mortgage-backed securities, a deal first reported by the Wall Street Journal .

A group of 22 investors including giant BlackRock Inc., MetLife Inc. and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York hold mortgage-backed securities, originally valued at $105 billion, bought from Countrywide Financial Corp. before it was acquired by Bank of America. The investors claim Countrywide misled them about the quality of the borrowers and collateral behind the securitized mortgages they purchased.

The settlement of $8.5 billion is bigger than all profits earned by the bank since the financial crisis began in 2008 -- and it's more than double what BofA spent to acquire Countrywide that same year.

Federal vs state power – Some 48 state attorneys general, consumer groups, and even a senior Treasury Department official are complaining that the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is trying to sidestep the Dodd-Frank law by continuing to pre-empt, or ignore, state consumer protection laws. 

The Conference of State Bank Supervisors says the federal bank regulator’s plan is “nothing short of an effort to preserve a [preemption] standard that Congress has clearly rejected.” George Madison, general counsel for the Treasury Department, took the rare step of publicly  criticizing the comptroller -- an independent agency within the department -- for failing to follow the Dodd-Frank law.

Big banks and the American Bankers Association support the Comptroller’s planned interpretation of the law. The comment deadline ended Tuesday on the Comptroller’s plan, and the agency must now analyze public feedback before finalizing its regulations.

Auto financing – Car dealers’ financing practices may get attention from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Federal Trade Commission in coming months, an industry lawyer writes at AutoDealerMonthly.com.  

Most likely to draw scrutiny, says Thomas Hudson, are dealers who “dummy up credit applications and supporting documents” to help credit applicants look better; those who add phantom equipment to car loan documents; and dealers who have never had their advertisements reviewed for federal and state requirements. “I expect that we will see some early efforts by the FTC and CFPB to determine who’s naughty and who’s nice,” Hudson writes.

Mortgage fraud – The number of suspicious activity reports for home loans jumped 31 percent in the first quarter of 2011, according to the federal Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. Why the rise?  FinCEN, which collects the reports from banks, says it’s because lenders did extra reviews after receiving demands to repurchase poorly performing loans.

How to improve financial literacy  – So-called “behavioral economics” may help consumers more than creating a bureaucracy to certify the effectiveness of financial literacy programs, the Government Accountability Office says. The behavioral approach includes things like automatically enrolling new hires in a 401(k) plan unless they explicitly opt out; simplifying investment options to avoid information overload; and motivating consumers to take action by showing that their peers are already doing so. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, in a response attached to the report, did not endorse or reject certification.

Reprinted by Permission © 2012, The Center for Public Integrity®. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Deputy Editor

Julie Vorman joined the Center in 2010 after more than 20 years as a correspondent, bureau chief, and editor at Reuters. As the Washington company news editor, she guided Reuters’ coverage of federal multi-billion-dollar bailouts to U.S. banks and automakers after the 2008 financial meltdown, the healthcare industry’s influence as Congress attempted to reform healthcare, and changes within the Securities and Exchange Commission after the Madoff investment fraud scheme. Vorman led the Reuters team that won the “Best in Business Breaking News” award from the Society...

202-466-1300

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.