Advertisement

June 19, 2013

Bank Failures in 2013: What's Ahead?

The beginning of the new year finds industry observers once again reflecting upon the role of failures in the banking landscape. As 2013 begins, the pace of bank failures has slowed substantially, but still remains stubbornly above pre- recession levels.

There were 51 bank failures nationwide in 2012, down from 92 in 2011, 157 in 2010, and 140 in 2009. As recently as 2005 and 2006, however, the nation had full calendar years without a single instance of bank failure... thus even 2012's reduced pace of receiverships remains high.

The key question, of course, is what 2013 might bring in terms of bank failures. Most industry sources estimate failure numbers below 2012's total, but still well above historical norms.

Factors affecting the potential bank failure rate in 2013 include:

  • For the first time in three years, the number of banks on the FDIC's confidential "problem" institution list has dropped below 700. At 694, the number of troubled institutions remains large (approximately 10% of the nation's 7,181 chartered financial institutions), but is below levels seen during the height of the recession. The peak occurred in 2010, when the FDIC's problem bank list included 884 institutions. By way of contrast, however, the problem bank list never rose above 150 in the dozen years prior to the most recent recession.
  • The real estate markets are gradually showing recovery. However, it remains unclear whether recovery activity will be robust enough to prevent the failure of some long-troubled banks, particularly those with exposure to markets where real estate recoveries are lagging.
  • As was the case in 2012, the size of many troubled institutions is smaller than that of those banks that failed earlier in the cycle. These smaller distressed banks often find attracting recapitalization partners — whether financial or strategic buyers — more challenging than for larger competitors with more substantial core deposit franchises.

For banks interested in acting as assuming institutions, the result of these factors may be continued opportunities for growth through FDIC-assisted transactions in 2013. One key to successfully assuming failed bank assets from the FDIC is remaining well-informed regarding current trends in FDIC-assisted transactions, including those with or without loss-share coverage.

© 2013 Schiff Hardin LLP

About the Author

The dynamics of the financial institutions industry require knowledgeable, experienced and nimble legal counsel.

The economic and regulatory climates for the financial institutions industry are changing daily and often in unpredictable ways. To survive and prosper in this environment, financial institutions must proactively prepare for the unexpected and be prepared to immediately react to changing circumstances when opportunities and/or challenges appear. That is why Schiff Hardin’s particular capabilities and strengths are vital to financial institutions clients. When it...

312-258-5504

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.