May 21, 2012

Bill Filed to Make Site-Specific, Risk-Based Clean-Up Standards Universally Available in Cleaning Up Contaminated Sites in North Carolina

A bill (North Carolina House Bill 45) was filed on February 7th, and referred to the House Environment committee the next day. The purpose House Bill 45 is to make site-specific, risk-based clean up standards universally available in cleaning up contaminated industrial sites, provided certain criteria are met. The idea of having universal, risk-based clean up standards is not new; it’s a subject that has been debated for some time. However, we believe the situation is different now, and that there is a very good chance that some bill for making site-specific, risk-based cleanup standards universally available in North Carolina will become law during this session of the General Assembly.

Under current law, site-specific, risk-based clean-up standards are available under some State environmental programs, such as the leaking underground tank program, but not available for other contaminated sites. The result is inconsistencies in what clean-up standards apply at different sites. For instance, under current law, risk-based standards apply to a petroleum leak from an underground tank, but they don’t apply to a petroleum leak from an above-ground tank. Under the bill in its current form, risk-based standards would not be available on any site where the contamination has migrated off-site. Fees would apply to any responsible party seeking application of site-specific, risk-based standards for a site, based upon the acreage of contamination.

Anyone who is a potentially responsible party for a contaminated site in North Carolina for which such standards are not currently available should monitor the progress of this bill. 

© 2012 Poyner Spruill LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Keith’s practice centers on development or redevelopment of property, and the environmental, utility and land use issues that arise from development projects.

He assists developers and local governments with the planning, permitting and construction of a variety of projects, including convention centers, parks and other public projects, residential developments, and marinas.  He especially enjoys “brownfields” projects, redeveloping contaminated property.  This work in part involves assisting clients with compliance with the State Environmental Policy Act...

(919) 783-1013

About the Author

Partner

David is an experienced contract lobbysit practicing before the North Carolina General Assembly on multiple issues, including health care, tax and business and corporate affairs. David’s lobbying practice is enhanced by almost two decades of experience with Poyner Spruill advocating for businesses in the areas of commercial construction, real property development, commercial landlord/tenant and financial transactions.

He is also an experienced trial attorney and has been involved in litigation in state and federal courts, as well as before numerous...

919.783.2812

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.