May 21, 2012

Blighted Biomass Crop Assistance Program Begins Again

A program to financially assist producers of renewable biomass crops is scheduled to restart, despite problems that led to its termination in April 2010. An inspector general report is calling for changes to the program, the Biomass Crop Assistance Program (BCAP) run by the Farm Service Agency (FSA).

The Farm Service Agency hastily organized the program to meet a deadline set by President Obama in 2009. As a result, the Farm Service Agency never developed a handbook, specialized forms, or a program—specific computer system. The agency also failed to determine standard moisture levels for biomass crops such as corn and sugarcane. Higher moisture levels increase the weight of crops, resulting in overpayments for some farmers.

The inspector general found that the program over—burdened field office personnel, resulted in unequal payments to participants, and led to a lack of oversight.

The inspector general recommended that the Farms Service Agency develop a specific handbook, as it usually does for the implementation of a major program, along with specialized forms and computer system tailored for biomass repayment.

If changes are not made, the program risks “potentially resulting in further inequitable treatment of program participants, improper payments, and reduced oversight and accountability.”

Last month, the Office of Management and Budget said the program could begin again. The Farm Service Agency will introduce a new computer system tailored to the Biomass Crop Assistance Program later this month.

FAST FACT: The 2008 Farm Bill authorized $25 million for the initiation of the Biomass Crop Assistance Program. In 2010, program funding jumped to $552 million.

Following are other new watchdog reports released by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), various federal Offices of Inspector General (OIG), and other government entities.

NATIONAL SECURITY

  • Power sources, such as batteries, for weapon systems and equipment cost the Pentagon $2.1 billion between 2006 and 2010. The Department of Defense lacks the necessary data to analyze the best use of its investments or develop standards for power sources. (GAO)
  • The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has identified 160,000 applicants who received improper disaster assistance payments totaling $643 million. Since 2007, FEMA has not attempted to recoup the improper payments. The inspector general is pushing the agency to begin collecting repayments. (OIG Department of Homeland Security)

ENVIRONMENT

  • The National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration must improve its accounting of expenses associated to the BP oil spill. The agency received $4 million for spill related costs as of September 2010, but without proper documentation, additional costs for its current activities in the Gulf will not be reimbursed. (OIG Department of Commerce)

HEALTH

  • Medicare payments for skilled nursing facilities nearly doubled, despite the age and characteristics of beneficiaries remaining the same. Between 2006 and 2008, costs increased from $5.7 billion to $10.7 billion. For-profit facilities were likely to bill higher costs for the same services provided by non-profit or government nursing facilities and a number had questionable billing practices. (OIG Department of Health and Human Services)
Reprinted by Permission © 2012, The Center for Public Integrity®. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Laurel Adams graduated cum laude from the University of Delaware in May of 2010 with majors in international relations, Spanish, and Latin American studies. She interned at Voices Without Borders in Wilmington, Del., and the British Embassy in Washington, D.C. While at the University of Delaware, Adams studied abroad in Argentina, helped start a Spanish conversation club, and served as an editor for the Sigma Iota Rho Journal of International Relations.

202-466-1300

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.