Advertisement

June 18, 2013

BMI and Music Publishers Launch Their Second Georgia Copyright Lawsuit in Six Days

In a prior post, we detailed a copyright lawsuit filed on January 22, 2013by Broadcast Music, Inc. (“BMI”) and various music publishers against an establishment in northern Georgia.  BMI and 11 music publishers (collectively “Plaintiffs”) have sued another establishment, this time in middle Georgia, marking BMI’s second filing of a copyright lawsuit in Georgia within the span of just six days.

In a copyright infringement complaint filed on January 28, 2013 in the Macon Division of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Plaintiffs allege that on August 9 and 10, 2012, Macon-based Northside Rivalry’s LLC d/b/a Rivalry’s on Northside (“the Establishment”), and an individual member of its LLC engaged in “unauthorized public performance” of six copyrighted songs, including Three Dog Night’s “Joy to the World” and Nirvana’s “Lithium.”  The complaint does not describe the Establishment’s manner of such performance.

The complaint seeks injunctive relief, statutory damages, and attorneys’ fees under the Copyright Act.

The case is Broadcast Music, Inc., et al. v. Northside Rivalry’s LLC d/b/a Rivalry’s on Northside, et al., No. 5:13-cv-0036-CAR, filed 01/28/13 in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Macon Division, assigned to U.S. District Judge C. Ashley Royal.

Copyright © 2013 Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Michael's career began in 1990, and for its first nine years included the preparation and prosecution of patent applications as well as intellectual property and business tort litigation. Michael has practiced intellectual property litigation exclusively since 1999. His patent litigation experience includes Markman (patent claim interpretation) proceedings, trials, and motion practice. A significant portion of his experience also includes trademark infringement litigation.

(404) 962-7520

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.