Advertisement

June 19, 2013

Bourbon's Return to Lexington Overcame a Bureaucratic Tangle

In September, Lexington saw the opening of the first bourbon distillery built here in more than 100 years. That is hard to imagine if you understand that Lexington was once the epicenter of bourbon production in Kentucky. However, Alltech Lexington Brewing and Distilling Company is one of only two distilleries currently operating within the city limits.

The new Alltech distillery sits adjacent to the original Distillery District in the Woodward Heights neighborhood, at 401 Cross St., between Maxwell Street and Pine Street. The expansion of Alltech's original micro-brewing facility to include a full-blown distillery has been in the works since August 2010, when Pearse Lyons, Alltech's president and founder, announced plans to build the $6 million distillery addition. Two short years later, tourists are pouring into the distillery visitor's center, touring the 20,000-square-foot facility and enjoying the unique taste of Alltech's Town Branch Bourbon, named appropriately after the body of water responsible for the location of our city that still flows through the heart of Lexington.

"It's a dream bringing a full brewery and a new distillery to downtown Lexington. I hope it becomes a tourist destination," Lyons said.

The Alltech distillery expansion did not happen overnight or without significant creative legal effort. The complex web of land-use planning law and ABC regulations that had to be navigated to ensure the project would be approved and completed on time was no small task. Alltech worked with a dedicated team at McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie & Kirkland, PLLC, to tackle the project, working together on all aspects from start to finish.

Urban infill projects are complex and multifaceted, and it is typical to encounter an interwoven web of conflicting regulations that must be carefully unknotted and reconfigured before the development is given approval to proceed. Chris Westover, who has been with McBrayer since 2004, not only enjoys "jigsaw puzzle-style" projects, but she is uniquely qualified for the task. Prior to coming to McBrayer, Westover worked for many years in the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government's Department of Law. From 1991 to late 2004, she was the legal advisor to the government's boards and commissions on land use and zoning matters. Westover hit the ground running with this project.

The first significant obstacle was incorporating a distillery into a subdivision with three or four different land-use zones, including an historical overlay of a very integral property. Logically, one approach could have been to rezone the properties. However, recognizing the timing and procedural challenges associated with that approach, Alltech and McBrayer elected to pursue the necessary approvals through the Board of Adjustment and keep the underlying zoning intact. They filed for two variances, a conditional use and an administrative appeal for the Board of Adjustment's consideration. This strategy accomplished in two months what could have taken at least six, had the rezoning been pursued instead. Keeping the clients' schedule intact was imperative and considered in every aspect of this project.

Though projects like Alltech's are very complicated and there is a lot of detailed work, at the end you have a development in the downtown area that is bound to drive even more interest and activity. It's also a showcase for Alltech. Moreover, the project is increasing the city's property tax rolls, employing its citizens and keeping people employed right here in the heart of Lexington. It is also driving tourism into downtown - conveniently situated within walking distance of the convention center and other downtown destinations. It's a win-win-win project, in McBrayer's estimation.

One of the other land-use issues was obtaining approval to adapt the historic Ice House building to a visitor's center. The Ice House presented multiple development issues. It had an historic overlay designation that required Board of Architectural Review approval of external improvements, such as handrails. Also, the underlying residential zoning category did not allow for a visitor's center. However, the building's prior history of non-conforming uses enabled the Board of Adjustment to grant the request to change one non-conforming use to another. Once approval from the Board of Adjustment was gained, the project was nearly finalized, but still more work needed to be done.

Combining the property parcels was necessary because of the existence of different zones and separate lots, which required approval of a consolidation plat. This step brought its own set of obstacles. Deeds had to be obtained and titles cleared. In this process, the McBrayer real estate attorneys discovered a vacant lot that had no street address and appeared to be part of an adjoining property. The land had not been accounted for, and the PVA did not have a separate listing for this parcel. In many urban infill areas, it is not uncommon for modern property transfers to uncover complications ranging from incorrect or incoherent legal descriptions to absence of platted or deeded easements, despite utility lines being in place, and other similar problems that have to be corrected. In this case, the problem was solved by identifying and locating a surviving descendant of the adjoining property to convey the parcel to the true owner.

Unless you know how to deal with these complex and sometimes hidden complications and have the staff and knowledge to address them, a project as complicated as this can quickly fall apart. It can be daunting if you are not accustomed to working with all of the diverse regulations and regulators involved.

Along a time frame that roughly mirrored the construction of the distillery, Alltech recognized the demand for its Kentucky Ale beer products was about to outstrip the limits of its microbrewery license. McBrayer's Hospitality Industry Services team, led by Stephen Amato, worked closely with the Alltech regulatory compliance staff in an ambitious relicensing process to take Alltech from a microbrewer to a full-fledged brewer, a process involving the LFUCG's Alcohol Beverage Control office, the Kentucky ABC and the federal Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB). Alltech now boasts the only active (in-state) full brewer's license in the Commonwealth of Kentucky.

© 2013 by McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie & Kirkland, PLLC. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Stephen G. Amato, civil litigation attorney, McBrayer Law Firm
Member

Mr. Amato has practiced law throughout Kentucky since his graduation from the University of Kentucky College of Law in 1990. He has been nominated and identified in Kentucky Super Lawyers® for six consecutive years, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012.

His practice is diverse, focusing on civil litigation and administrative law. His litigation practice is focused primarily on employment law, representing employers in all state and federal trial courts, state and local administrative agencies, and throughout the respective courts of appeal. Employment-related issues with which...

859-554-4414

About the Author

Christine Neal Westover, Real Estate Attorney, McBrayer Law Firm
Associate

Chris Westover is an associate with McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie & Kirkland, PLLC and practices in the Lexington. Ms. Westover has an extremely deep and broad expertise of the laws governing land use in Kentucky and the procedural and substantive complexities that underpin planning and zoning matters. She also developed significant experience dealing with governmental divisions such as Building Inspection, Code Enforcement and other administrative bodies due to their regulatory authority in land use matters.

859-231-8780

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.