Advertisement

May 18, 2013

Brand Owners Take Note: gTLD Applications Revealed, Comment Period Begins

Just over a week ago, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) revealed the list of the 1,930 generic top-level domains (gTLDs) for which ICANN has received applications. This long-awaited announcement is the next step toward the first-large scale expansion of gTLDs in Internet history. Currently, there are only 22 gTLDs, including the familiar .com, .net, and .org. The entire list of applications is available at ICANN’s Web site:http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/application-results/strings-1200utc-13jun12-en.

Of the 1,930 applications, 66 are geographic name applications (e.g. .london and .paris) and 116 are for internationalized domain names in scripts such as Arabic, Chinese, and Cyrillic. Applications were filed from 60 countries and territories, with 911 coming from North America, 675 from Europe, 303 from the Asia-Pacific region, 24 from Latin America and the Caribbean, and 17 from Africa. 

Unsurprisingly, there are multiple applicants for numerous gTLDs composed of arguably generic or descriptive terms like .music and .shopping, which will likely be auctioned off to the highest bidding applicant. Brand owners should review the list carefully for applications that might be relevant to their businesses, and in particular for applications with gTLDs that may be confusingly similar to their trademarks. 

A 60-day public comment period is now open for general comments on the applications. There will then be a six-month period for more specific objections based on, among other things, trademark rights.

© 2013 Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP.

About the Author

Partner

Lee J. Eulgen has significant experience in intellectual property litigation, negotiation and counseling, including trademark, copyright, patent, trade secret, trade dress, domain name, entertainment, unfair competition and privacy-related matters. In particular, Lee has firstchaired myriad intellectual property disputes, and he has handled numerous brand and technology- driven transactions, including sophisticated licensing transactions, as well as mergers, acquisitions, and asset transfers.

In addition, Lee is well versed in strategic global trademark...

312-269-8465

About the Author

Partner

Michael G. Kelber represents and counsels individuals and corporations in all aspects of intellectual property law and related transactions and litigation. He has represented clients in copyright, trademark and patent litigation, including seeking and defending temporary restraining orders, preliminary injunctions and summary judgment motions. He has prepared and prosecuted numerous U.S. and foreign patent and trademark applications. Michael has also drafted and negotiated patent, trademark and software development licenses, and information technology outsourcing and...

312-269-5322

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.