Advertisement

May 23, 2013

Breach Report Leads to $1.5 Million HIPAA Security Settlement

A Massachusetts provider, yesterday, agreed to pay $1.5 million to settle potential violations of the HIPAA Security Rule.  The provider also agreed to abide by a corrective action plan requiring improvement in policies and procedures to safeguard the privacy and security of patient protected health information (PHI) and retain an independent monitor for a three-year period. 

The settlement comes after an investigation from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Civil Rights (OCR) following a breach report submitted by the provider.  The breach report noted the theft of an unencrypted personal laptop containing electronic PHI (ePHI) of the provider’s patients and research subjects.  OCR found that the provider failed, over an extended period of time, to comply with various Security Rule requirements including:

  • Conducting a thorough risk analysis regarding the confidentiality of ePHI maintained on portable devises
  • Implementing security measures sufficient to ensure the confidentiality of ePHI that the provider created, maintained, and transmitted using portable devices
  • Adopting and implementing policies and procedures to restrict access to ePHI to authorized users of portable devices
  • Adopting and implementing policies and procedures to address security incident identify, reporting, and response.

OCR noted that the provider’s continued failures demonstrate “a long-term, organizational disregard for the requirements of the Security Rule.”  Yesterday’s settlement is a large settlement for alleged provider HIPAA violations.  It emphasizes the need for providers to consistently update their risk analysis and policies and procedures, prioritize HIPAA compliance, and maintain compliance programs with continued monitoring.

©2013 von Briesen & Roper, s.c

About the Author

Meghan O’Connor is a member of the Health Care Practice Group. Her practice focuses on general health law including managed care and provider contracting, risk management, and regulatory compliance.

Prior to joining von Briesen, Meghan worked for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services where she consulted with states regarding federal health law, regulation and policy, evaluating managed care contracts and conducting compliance reviews.

414-287-1586

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.