April 16, 2014

Budgets, Resolutions, Appropriations, Oh My!

Over the past few weeks, the Capitol Health Record has detailed the passage of the House and Senate Congressional Budget Resolutions and the release of the President’s Budget. Below we breakdown the differences between each of the major steps in the Federal budget process.

President’s Budget

  • Deadline: President must submit to Congress on or before the first Monday in February.

  • Purpose: Serves as a political blueprint of the President’s priorities and a guideline for the Congressional appropriations process.

  • Key players: President, Administration, Office of Management and Budget (OMB)

  • No force of law.

Congressional Budget Resolution

  • Deadline:  Each Chamber must pass a budget resolution by April 15th each year.

  • Purpose: Provides estimates for spending and revenue and a guide for the Appropriations Committees. Serves as a blueprint of each Chamber’s priorities; priorities may differ between the two Chambers.

  • Key players: House and Senate Budget Committees

  • No force of law.


  • Deadline: Appropriations bills must be passed by the start of the fiscal year (FY) – orOctober 1st of each year. If there is no agreement by October 1st, Congress must pass a continuing resolution (CR) to continue funding federal agencies and programs.

  • Purpose: Twelve bills with jurisdiction over specified federal agencies and programs allocate the money allotted by the budget.

  • Key players: House and Senate Appropriations Committees

  • Once passed by Congress and signed by the President, appropriations bills (or omnibus measures) become law.

©2014 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved

About the Author


The Lobbying & Advocacy team is composed of lawyers and government relations professionals who have extensive experience advancing client interests before the legislative and executive branches of government at the federal, state and municipal levels. We use this experience to assist health care providers, academic medical centers, e-health and telemedicine networks, membership trade organizations, health professional societies, patient advocacy associations and other entities advance their public policy and advocacy agendas.



Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.