Advertisement

May 20, 2013

Building a Ready for Action Intellectual Property Portfolio Strategy for In-House Counsel

Checklist for Intellectual Property Portfolio

In-house counsel and clients would have a better relationship if attorneys sent clients Intellectual Property (IP) reports on a more regular basis, according to Jeffrey Scott Leaning and Timothy B. Donaldson, Partners, at MH2 Technology Law Group. “This partnership makes for the ideal management of an IP portfolio,” they add.

Jeffrey Scott Leaning and Timothy B. Donaldson share their thoughts with  Maria Gregoriou on why the managed legal services approach is mutually beneficial for attorneys and clients.

How can legal department management increase operational efficiency? 

Timothy B. Donaldson: Open communication between attorneys and clients is key to building a strong business partnership. One way to keep clients informed about ongoing IP prosecution is through the use of regular status reports. These reports can include budgetary information issues, upcoming due dates, a summary of actions performed, or a projection of future action items, and can be customized to a client’s specific needs. Fostering this business partnership through open communication and recognizing a client’s specific needs makes for the ideal management of an IP portfolio.

Under a flat or fixed-fee arrangement, a team of attorneys can be assembled to review and share expertise on individual cases. Each team member brings his or her own technical, legal, and professional experiences to the table, making IP analysis more efficient and productive. In addition, each team member becomes familiar with a client’s technology and can be ready to respond as needs arise.

In view of the American Invents Act, what patent filing strategies can you recommend?

Jeffrey Scott Leaning: Clients should approach patent filing as if the US was an absolute novel country in this area. The ideal situation is that people who receive a disclosure should be under a confidentiality agreement. If this is not possible, the client should know who is going to be in the audience during disclosure.

What should legal departments keep in mind when dealing with pharmaceutical patents?

Timothy B. Donaldson: Patent term adjustments (PTAs) must not be overlooked when it comes to the pharmaceutical field. Unlike other technologies, the term of a pharmaceutical patent, including any PTA accrued during prosecution, can be critical to the patent’s ultimate value. Thus, the practitioner must keep up with current case law, like the recent Exelixis cases, as well as changes in United States Patent and Trademark Office policy and rules, to maximize any potential PTA and avoid unnecessarily losing valuable patent term during the course of prosecution.

Do you have any final thoughts?

Jeffrey Scott Leaning: Managed legal services approaches are currently being preferred as the law firm is closer in style to an in-house attorney, where a partnership is formed between the client and the law firm. A certain number of hours that expert attorneys should be on call every month for a fixed fee, would be part of the agreement. A good relationship is vital here as more time may be put into legal matters than was originally thought. Having this partnership model in place would be mutually beneficial and ensure that the client’s expectations are met.


About MH2 Technology Law Group

MH2 Technology Law Group LLP is an intellectual property law firm specializing in practice before the US Patent and Trademark Office, strategic counselling, and patent portfolio management. We are committed to developing long-term, mutually beneficial relationships with our clients though the use of seasoned attorneys, client-focused pricing, and a deep understanding of our clients’ technologies and businesses.

About the Author

Over the years, the marcus evans summit format has gained considerable prestige as the ideal method for uniting decision makers and solution providers. We maintain a high level of selectivity, opening the events to senior level executives only who are individually selected and qualified. This commitment to quality ensures a relevant and productive networking environment for all participants.

The two- or three-day agenda delivers unparalleled insight on key issues as identified by the executive community. Extensive research with industry professionals...

312-540-3000 x6515

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.