May 21, 2012

Calculating Overtime Pay: Using the Fluctuating Workweek Method Can Save Employers Money

It is well known that salaried executive, administrative and professional employees are exempt from having to be paid overtime when they work more than 40 hours a workweek. There are, however, categories of salaried employees who work considerable amounts of overtime but are not exempt, or whose categorization as exempt would be questionable. In some cases, these individuals have technical skills or other qualifications that warrant a substantial salary. Therefore, paying them at the standard overtime rate (one and one-half times their regular rate of pay for all hours worked over 40 in a workweek) can amount to a lot of money.

There is, however, a lawful means by which employers can pay this category of employees significantly less in overtime. Under the fluctuating workweek method, the employee's salary is set at a fixed amount, regardless of how many hours he or she works in a week. The time worked can vary above and below 40 hours per workweek, but the salary itself does not change. The concept is that by being paid a fixed amount for all hours worked, the employee is already being paid for hours worked over 40 at straight time. Therefore, the only additional compensation that the employee is entitled to is one-half (not one and one-half) the regular rate of pay for hours worked over 40 during a workweek.

Calculating the Savings

To understand the potential savings, consider a non-exempt employee who earns an annual salary of $52,000 ($1,000 a week). Using the conventional method of calculating overtime, that employee would be paid by calculating his or her regular hourly rate for the workweek ($1,000 / 40 hours = $25 an hour) and multiplying the hours worked over 40 by one and one-half times that rate ($25 x 1.5 = $37.50 an hour), as illustrated in the following chart: 

Hours Worked  Regular Rate  Overtime Rate  Week's Compensation
40 $25.00  No overtime  $1,000.00
50 $25.00  $37.50  $1,375.00
60  $25.00  $37.50  $1,750.00

 Take the same facts, except assume there is a mutual understanding that the employee makes $1,000 a week regardless of how many hours he or she works. Under the fluctuating workweek method of calculation, the employee would be paid as follows: 

Hours Worked  Regular Rate  Overtime Rate  Week's Compensation
40 $25.00  No overtime  $1,000.00
50  $20.00  $10.00  $1,100.00
60 $16.67  $8.33  $1,166.66

Under the fluctuating workweek method, an employee earns a correspondingly lower overtime rate as the hours worked increase. This is because when calculating overtime, the fluctuating workweek method considers that the employer has already compensated the employee for all hours worked in the week, including those hours over 40. As a result, the regular rate decreases as the employee works more hours, which causes the "half time" rate for the hours worked over 40 to also become lower. As illustrated in the chart above, when the employee works 50 hours in a week, the employer pays $275 less by using the fluctuating workweek method. Clearly, this approach can lead to substantial savings over the course of a year.

Potential Downsides

As attractive as the fluctuating workweek method might seem, there are many instances where it may not actually benefit the employer. For example, under this compensation method, the employee receives the same fixed amount even if he or she works less than 40 hours in a given week. Over time, if the employee works under 40 hours as much as or more than he or she works over 40 hours, the employer may derive no benefit from using the fluctuating workweek method. In other words, an employer saves money only if the employee is expected to work large amounts of overtime on a consistent basis.

There are also a number of requirements that must be met in order for an employer to use the fluctuating workweek method. First of all, the hours worked must actually fluctuate. If the employee is told that he or she is expected to work 50 hours each week and the amount does not vary, then the fluctuating workweek method cannot be used.

There must also be a "clear mutual understanding" that the fixed salary is compensation for all hours worked in a workweek, regardless of how many hours the employee actually works. This does not mean that a formal agreement is required, but an employer must be able to show that there was a clear and explicit communication with the employee about the compensation method being used.

Other Questions

Can the fluctuating workweek method be used if the employee never works less than 40 hours in a week? In Urnikis-Negro v. American Family Property Service, decided August 4, 2010, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago indicated, as it had in an earlier decision, that even if the workweek only fluctuated above the statutory 40-hour maximum (rather than below it), the fluctuating workweek method still could be applied.

Is the employee's salary considered "fixed" if he or she is also entitled to additional bonuses or premiums that vary weekly pay? Some courts have taken the view that the "fixed salary" requirement for applying the fluctuating workweek method is not met if an employee's weekly earnings vary because he or she is entitled to a bonus or premium (other than overtime pay). An employer utilizing the fluctuating workweek method, therefore, should avoid offering such additional pay entitlements. By the same token, the U.S. Department of Labor does not allow an employer utilizing the fluctuating workweek method to make deductions from an employee's salary for absences in a given week, including deductions for illness, sick leave and personal business.

Although the fluctuating workweek method can save an employer money, implementation can be complex, and there are a number of rules and potential downsides to consider. 

© 2012 Much Shelist, P.C.

About the Author

Principal

Irving M. Geslewitz, a Principal in the firm's Labor & Employment and Litigation & Dispute Resolution practice groups, has extensive experience in representing employers from a broad spectrum of industries in all aspects of modern employment law, as well as traditional (union-related) labor law concerns. He regularly handles matters ranging from reviewing and...

312-521-2414

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.