Advertisement

June 19, 2013

Caldwell Freight Lines to Pay $120,000 to Settle EEOC Race Discrimination Lawsuit

Freight Delivery Company Refused to Hire Blacks, Federal Agency Charged

Caldwell Freight Lines, Inc., a former Lenoir, N.C.- based trucking delivery company, will pay $120,000 to settle a race discrimination lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency announced this week.

The EEOC alleged that Caldwell discriminated against Desmond Burch and other black applicants by refusing to hire them because of their race, African-American, in April 2010.  According to the lawsuit, Caldwell had vacancies for dock workers and accepted applications from approximately 51 individuals.  Burch and several other black applicants had dock worker experience and were qualified for the job.  Despite their qualifications, neither Burch nor any of the other black applicants were hired.  Instead Caldwell hired whites and other non-blacks for the jobs.  Further, the EEOC alleged that one of Caldwell’s high level managers at the facility commented that he “didn’t want any blacks on the dock.”  During the time period covered by the lawsuit, no blacks were employed as dock workers at the facility.  Caldwell is no longer in operation.  

Race discrimination violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  The EEOC filed suit after first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its conciliation process. 

In addition to the $120,000 in monetary damages to be shared by the black applicants involved in the lawsuit, the consent decree resolving the case (EEOC v. Caldwell Freight Lines, Inc., Case No. 5:11CV00134, filed in U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, Statesville Division), includes prospective injunctive relief in the event Caldwell restarts operations in the future.  The injunctive relief enjoins the company from discriminating on the basis of race, or any other protected category, or engaging in retaliation within the meaning of Title VII.  The decree also requires the redistribution of the company’s discrimination/harassment policy and requires the company to provide annual training on race discrimination and retaliation to the company’s managers, supervisors and employees.  Finally, if it resumes business operations, Caldwell must report complaints of race discrimination and information regarding its hiring practices during the term of the decree.

“Unfortunately, race discrimination in hiring continues despite the passage of Title VII nearly 50 years ago, and African-Americans are often the victims,” said Lynette A. Barnes, regional attorney for the EEOC’s Charlotte District office.  “The EEOC will continue to prosecute cases where the evidence indicates that any form of race discrimination has occurred.  All races are entitled to equal opportunity in the workplace.”

Tina Burnside, supervisory trial attorney in the Charlotte District Office added “Employment should be based on ability and qualifications, not irrelevant factors such as race. The EEOC will continue to fight to ensure that people are not denied work simply because of their race.” 

© Copyright 2012 - U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

About the Author

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is responsible for enforcing federal laws that make it illegal to discriminate against a job applicant or an employee because of the person's race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information. It is also illegal to discriminate against a person because the person complained about discrimination, filed a charge of discrimination, or participated in an employment discrimination investigation or lawsuit.

Most employers with at least 15...

800-669-4000

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.