April 18, 2014

California Revises its New Commission Contract Requirement

In 2011, the California Legislature passed AB 1396 to amend Labor Code section 2751, and require that employers provide employees with a contract detailing the method by which commission, when applicable, would be computed and paid to employees.  The contract requirement is set to go into effect on January 1, 2013, and applies to in-state and out-of-state businesses that contract with employees for services within the state of California.

This requirement applies to employees if the contemplated form of compensation involves commission.  AB 1396 included exceptions from the definition of “commission,” including bonuses and profit-sharing plans, unless the compensation plans involve a fixed percentage of sales or profit as payment for work performed.

The Legislature further amended section 2751 at the end of the 2012 legislative session to include an additional exception to the definition of “commission.”  Now employers need not provide written contracts to explain a compensation system that includes payments that are temporary, variable and only increase the payment an employee may receive, as such a system is excluded from the definition of “commission.”

This amendment should remind any employer that has not yet prepared commission contracts to do so, have them reviewed and get executed copies from employees by January 1, 2013.  In addition, employers should now take the time to ensure that existing and drafted employee contracts reflect the change in the law.

©2014 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Greenberg Traurig’s Labor & Employment Practice provides an array of workplace strategies and legal counsel, including practical and efficient consulting, technical assistance and litigation services. 


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in