May 22, 2012

California's High Speed Rail Project: Business Plan Released

On November 1, 2011, the California High Speed Rail Authority (the “Authority”) introduced its long awaited Draft Business Plan (the “Plan”). A 60-day comment period now commences. The Plan must also be submitted to the state Senate and Assembly Transportation and Budget Committees. Although the legislature does not have a strict legal obligation to “approve” the Plan per se, the legislature does have critical appropriations and funding authority that effectively give it veto power over the Plan. The legislature will likely hold hearings before providing any appropriations for the year 2012. Governor Brown remains supportive of the project. The cost of the project has doubled, to more than $98 billion, with an extended timeline for final completion in 2033. This is therefore a key moment for California's ambitious plan for high speed rail.

Various officials spoke at a press conference on November 1, 2011, in Sacramento, California. The Authority's Chairman, Tom Umberg, led the press conference, and other Board members and transit and labor leaders spoke in favor of the Plan as "reasonable."

Mike Rossi, one of two recent Governor's appointees to the Authority and a former Vice Chair of Bank of America, spoke to the funding, financials, ridership numbers, operating expenses and capital costs and other financing numbers and determined the "model is reasonable."

The Authority is taking a "blended approach" working with existing train tracks, and will construct "segments in pieces" (beginning in the middle of the state and going north and south from there).

The Initial Operating System will be constructed in the Central Valley and the Authority remains confident in private investment, with anticipated net operating profits and a potential 30-year concession arrangement.

Labor supports this as a way to get "a million jobs" for California. Federal and state funding is in place.

Now the real efforts begin to reassure state legislators, the public and private investors that this is a viable Plan.

©2012 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Shareholder

 

More than 35 years of experience in working with businesses, both domestically and internationally in a wide range of industries including serving as a senior executive with a NYSE listed company, gives Paul a unique outlook when advising clients facing the challenges of today's economy. Paul's background combines cross-border representation of clients in acquisition, disposition, debt, and equity financing transactions, including acting as an advisor to multi-national enterprises in rule 144A, initial public and high yield debt offerings.

305-579-0685

About the Author

Shareholder

Andrew Herring advises public and private sector clients in relation to project structuring, the structuring of concession arrangements, P3 and energy and infrastructure contracts. Andrew has particular expertise in advising public sector authorities, private sector operators and infrastructure providers in the international heavy and light rail (metro) sectors. Andrew is recognised by the Chambers UK.

+44 (0) 203 349 8750

Contributors

Shareholder

Mr. Meier has extensive federal and state complex litigation experience in California courts, including trial, arbitration, and mediation experience representing corporations and individuals. Mr. Meier’s practice focuses on state and local procurement and government contracts involving bid protests, RFPs and solicitations, counseling and litigation, subcontractor and vendor disputes, public records and governmental disputes, and related administrative advocacy and writ proceedings. Mr. Meier routinely handles regulatory hearings and governmental affairs matters before regulators...

916-442-1111

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.