May 22, 2012

Can a Forbearance Agreement Actually Help a Lender Collect from Its Debtor?

While it may be instinctive for a lender to bring suit against a defaulting borrower, entering into a forbearance agreement instead may actually increase a lender's chances of successfully collecting a debtor's obligation. A forbearance agreement, sometimes called a standstill agreement, is a binding contract between a lender and a borrower that extends the time available for a borrower to perform under the operative loan documents.

While not every situation will lend itself to a forbearance agreement, this alternative can be beneficial to a lender if the facts and circumstances are appropriate. By entering into a forbearance agreement, a lender gives up certain rights, including the right to immediate payment of its borrower's obligations. In return, however, a lender will receive benefits. For example, a lender can require a borrower to make admissions in the agreement or waive certain rights. A lender may also have the opportunity to correct any collateral deficiencies. However, any increase or changes in collateral should be structured in a manner that avoids potential preference liability (e.g., by having the forbearance period extend for more than 90 days). Additionally, a lender can often charge a forbearance fee to the borrower for entering into the agreement. Lastly, the borrower may be able to locate another party to "take out" the existing lender. This will allow a lender to be paid, hopefully in full, without having to look to the collateral, if any, and bear the cost of liquidating that collateral. Similarly, a short extension of time may provide a borrower with the breathing room it needs to clear whatever hurdles it faces and repay its obligations.

In order to take full advantage of the potential benefits of a forbearance agreement,  a lender must ensure that the document is properly drafted. The agreement should not only contain express language implementing the benefits outlined above, but also set forth the facts and circumstances of the borrower's financial situation and its relationship with the lender. Although each case is different, following are a few items that a lender may want to include in a forbearance agreement:

  1. A recital of all of the obligations and obligators (including guarantors);
  2. A recitation of the collateral securing the obligations of the borrower;
  3. A requirement that the forbearance agreement identify the specific defaults under the operative loan agreements; 
  4. A reaffirmation of the borrower's financial and non-financial obligations (including representations, covenants and warranties);
  5. A waiver of defenses against the lender;
  6. A release for the benefit of the lender from the borrower;
  7. A termination date; and 
  8. A list of events that would constitute events of default under the agreement.

Ultimately, a lender should consider all of its options, including entering into a forbearance agreement, before bringing suit against a borrower in default. While it may seem counterintuitive, a forbearance agreement, if properly drafted and used, can actually improve the chances that a lender will be paid.

© 2012 Much Shelist, P.C.

About the Author

Special Counsel

Jeffrey L. Gansberg is an experienced bankruptcy and trial attorney with an extensive background in both the transactional and litigation aspects of insolvency, reorganization and creditors’ rights representations. Jeff represents debtors,...

312-521-2649

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.