Advertisement

May 18, 2013

Can Our Grid Really Get Smart?

We have been hearing a lot about the smart grid lately.  In June the Obama administration unveiled its new smart grid initiative which includes a host of programs to update our aging power grid and make it more efficient.  Some utilities are ahead of the curve, having already installed smart meters in the homes and businesses.  The grid is a century old and hasn’t undergone any significant, nationwide modernization effort since the Great Depression. 

There is little doubt that we can build a smarter grid by adding and upgrading functionalities of the current infrastructure.  But how effective can that be?  If you start with an aged grid, there is only so much new technology can do to enhance efficiency, provide better monitoring capabilities, supply real-time information, support decentralized generation and allow for multi-directional transmission, all of which are important, if not essential, features of a truly smart grid.  It is possible that we may see better, more efficient smart grids in developing countries because mature economies may be slower or less able to adopt the necessary technologies due to their significant investment in existing distribution networks.  For example, India is moving forward with mini smart grids or micro-grids to bring electricity to relatively inaccessible areas.  These mini smart grids work on a combination of solar cells, micro-hydro power plants, wind turbines and biomass, using the national power grid and small diesel-powered generators as back-up power sources.  The first example of India’s mini grid is at Gurgaon, outside of New Delhi. 

Given that the U.S. has extensive grid infrastructure already in place, modernization must occur in a step-by-step fashion, with the goal of upgrading each area of functionality within the system.  The entire process can and will have to be done over time, rather than all at once.  Automation of generation facilities, substations, distribution, demand response and metering can evolve separately or in conjunction with one another. 

Overlying all these issues is the fact that the U.S. has been unable to agree on any meaningful smart grid standards.  We know our grid can get smarter, but exactly how smart remains to be seen.

© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

About the Author

Member

Kate Bechen is a member of the firm’s Transactional Practice Group where she focuses on corporate finance, health law and general business matters. She regularly assists clients with mergers and acquisitions, venture capital financing, public and private placement of securities, ongoing reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and general corporate law matters. Her health law practice includes transactional work, regulatory compliance, medical staff issues and patient confidentiality. She is also an active member of the firm’s Energy & Sustainability Industry...

414-225-4956

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.