Advertisement

May 20, 2013

Can You Get Fired for Working Too Much?

You recently read an article stating that a court found that a major national retailer owes overtime pay for work performed "off the clock" by workers in 27 stores. News reports talk of a $50 million price tag for a settlement of similar claims against the same employer in Colorado, and lawsuits have been filed in nearly 30 other states.

You have also heard the story of a Chicago woman fired from her job after she was caught working on her lunch break. Why would an employer fire an employee for seemingly going the extra mile? Perhaps because experienced HR professionals and other business people know that these and other issues involving employee pay have become one of the most complex and litigious areas involving employees and employers.

The primary source of wage and hour regulation is the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which establishes a minimum wage and a 40-hour overtime standard for covered employees. But the FLSA does not stand alone in the federal regulation of wages and hours. Most states also have their own laws regulating wages and hours. An employer must comply with both state and federal law. Where the state and federal law impose different requirements, the employer must follow the standard that is most beneficial to the employee.

So what is "off the clock" work?

Working off the clock covers a wide range of activities, both authorized and unauthorized. It may involve deliberate falsification of time records and coercion of extra, unpaid work. It may just be a dedicated worker, like in Chicago, who voluntarily works during lunch or after hours to take care of a customer or finish a report. Or it may be ignorance of an employer or supervisor as to just what activities must be counted as working time.

Whatever the situation and no matter the size of the company, employers need to know what to be on the lookout for, and understand their obligations in resolving the issues.

Consider these common problem areas:

  • Pre-clock activities, such as opening the store, donning uniforms or warming up trucks
  • Arriving workers who rush to help customers before clocking in
  • Working into or through the meal hour
  • Staying over to finish with a customer
  • Staying late to clean up or balance accounts
  • Meetings or training outside normal hours
  • Stocking or inventory outside normal hours
  • Time spent on call or standing by if needed
  • Working at home

All of these activities occur regularly in every workplace and all are generally considered to be compensable work. This is true regardless of whether management requires them or employees perform them voluntarily. If management knows about the conduct and fails to stop it, the company is liable. It should be noted that not all training or on-call circumstances require compensation.

Practical Steps for Minimizing Off-the-Clock Claims

So how can employers avoid such protracted and messy disputes? At a minimum take the following steps:

  • Establish Responsibility for Compliance - It is essential that there be an individual who possess the necessary skills that is specifically designated to be responsible for wage and hour compliance.
  • Establish & Maintain Compliant Policies & Practices - Employers also should ensure that policies and practices are in place that ensure wage and hour compliance. Policies should be communicated to employees. Employers also should have internal policies and practices in place, including accurate time-keeping systems.
  • Establish Training Programs - Having compliant policies and practices in place do not insulate employers from liability if they are not implemented properly. In many areas, managers are on the front lines of ensuring wage and hour compliance.

Finally, employees who perform off the clock work deserve compensation for the additional hours they have worked. Pay them and then make a determination as to why it happened – a dedicated but misguided employee is a much different situation and comes with much less potential damages and negative publicity than a manager telling employees to clock out but continue working.

As always, it is imperative to know and understand all of the regulations that apply to your business at all levels: federal, state, and local. Failure to know and apply these regulations can lead to hefty fines and negative public perception for the company.

As seen in Business First of Louisville.

© 2013 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Scott Summers has practiced labor and employment law for more than 20 years and represents employers, ranging from small businesses to Fortune 100 companies, in various industries throughout the United States. His extensive experience includes assisting clients through more than 50 union organizing campaigns, multiple corporate campaigns, numerous labor arbitration cases and many collective bargaining negotiations.

Additionally, Scott litigates cases in federal and state courts and before administrative agencies, such as the National Labor Relations Board, the Equal Employment...

(502) 581-8059

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.