Advertisement

May 21, 2013

Can You Unsettle a Settlement Agreement?

Consider this: You have been sued by one of your customers. In order to resolve the dispute quickly and efficiently, you agree in principle to settle the dispute, and decide to work out the terms later. You document your “agreement to agree” in an e-mail, and the customer responds that it too “agrees to agree.” However, you later decide that you do not want to be bound by this settlement agreement. Can you get out of it? Generally speaking, yes.

What Makes a Contract Enforceable?

All contracts, including settlement agreements, require an offer, acceptance of that offer and consideration (i.e., something of value—generally monetary—that causes a party to enter into an agreement). But most importantly, parties to a contract must also have a “meeting of the minds” on all material elements or terms for a contract to be enforceable. (For example, in a real estate contract, material terms would constitute the parties, the subject real estate, the price and the time frame for closing). If the parties agree to leave the “big ticket” items for later negotiation, the contract is likely to be unenforceable. Moreover, the mere fact that the communications between the parties included the terms “offer” and “accept[ance]” is insufficient to bind the parties. If the parties have not reached agreement on all essential terms, there is no enforceable contract.

Furthermore, if an agreement refers to a subsequent formal agreement to be executed by the parties, the initial agreement is generally not binding. This is true even when the parties agree to the general terms of an initial settlement agreement if they understand that the execution of a formal agreement is a prerequisite for being bound. In such a case, there is no enforceable settlement agreement until the final agreement is signed by all parties.

It is important to note that a preliminary agreement can be enforceable in some cases, but it must address each and every material term that is to be incorporated into the final agreement. The final agreement would then be considered a mere recitation of the agreement previously reached between the parties.

Confused? If you are uncertain about whether to enter into a settlement agreement in the first place, or if you have concerns about an existing agreement, your best option is to seek counsel from an attorney who is well-versed in contract law. By doing so, you will gain a knowledgeable advocate who can discuss your particular situation and the steps you might be able to take to minimize risk and protect your business.

© 2010 Much Shelist Denenberg Ament & Rubenstein, P.C.

About the Author

Much Shelist is a full-service business law firm based in Chicago. Since our founding in 1970, and as we have grown to approximately 85 attorneys, we have nurtured a collaborative culture that emphasizes sophisticated, senior-level attention to client matters, combined with a collegial, creative atmosphere that allows us to deliver the highest level of service to every client. In addition, we are firmly committed to remaining independent, thus creating an environment of stability for our clients and our attorneys.

We serve as...

312-521-2000

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.