Advertisement

May 25, 2013

Cell Tower Leases – What Does Your Bank Say?

Be sure to check with your bank or other mortgage holder before you sign a cell tower lease.  That’s because the lease may violate your mortgage, which could put you in default, even though your payments are up to date. Being in default on your mortgage is not good.

The reason for concern is that banks (or whoever holds the mortgage on your property) don’t want the value of your property decreased, as this reduces the security for their loan.  A poorly drafted cell tower lease can harm property values by restricting your ability to develop or use the property for years in the future, or otherwise “sell off” too many rights to your property.

For this reason, mortgage holders will sometimes veto cell tower leases – at least until the objectionable terms are removed. Getting rid of those terms is usually beneficial for you.  And even if the veto stands, you will have avoided a mortgage default.

So a word to the wise – always check with your bank or other mortgage holder before you enter into a cell tower lease.  It may improve your lease terms or prevent you being in default on your mortgage.

© 2013 Varnum LLP

About the Author

Partner

John is co-chair of the firm’s Cable and Telecommunications Practice Group. He focuses on representing municipalities nationwide on cable and telecommunications matters including the grant, renewal and transfer of cable franchises, Wi-Fi and Wi-Max (wireless) agreements, telecommunications matters, right of way matters, cellular tower zoning, cell tower leasing and FCC proceedings. He has worked with over 200 communities in 15 states on such matters. He also represents municipal and cooperative utilities and...

616/336-6725

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.