April 20, 2014

Census Publishes Changes to Export Filing Requirements

On Thursday, March 14, the Census Bureau published a final rule implementing changes to the Foreign Trade Regulations, 15 C.F.R. Part 30.  The final rule includes long-awaited changes to the post-departure filing program commonly referred to as Option 4.  In addition, Census made several important modifications to the proposed rules published in January 2011, several of which are outlined, below.  In addition, the final rule makes remedial changes to the FTR to improve clarity and correct errors. 

The changes implemented by the final rule are effective January 8, 2014, with certain limited exceptions.  The full text of the final rule is available here in 78 Federal Register 16366.

Although a number of changes are included in the final rule, undoubtedly the most anticipated is the publication of the rule for post-departure filing based on comments from the trade and a review of post-departure data.  The changes included in the final rule include a backing away from the proposed commodity-based approach that sought to limit post-departure filing to commodity types that were perishable or otherwise seen to rely on post-departure filing.  As a result, all currently authorized post-departure filers will be able to continue to utilize their status, regardless of their commodity types.  The window for post-departure filing will be shortened, however, from 10 calendar days to five.  Census determined, based on a review of historical data, that most filers submit their data within five days post-departure, and therefore this was determined to be a reasonable timeframe.  At the same time, Census and U.S. Customs and Border Protection have agreed, for the time being, to continue the current moratorium on new applicants for post-departure status in place since 2003.

Several other important (but not as high profile) changes have been made to the proposed regulations that were published in January 2011.  These include:

  • Census removed the proposed requirement that the country of origin of exported goods be reported.  Therefore, the current requirement, requiring the designation of goods only as “Domestic” or “Foreign,” will stand; and
  • Census determined that several fields that it proposed changing from optional to conditional represent data that may be unavailable or extremely difficult to obtain at the time of export, and so these fields are being retained as “optional” fields.  For example, the seal number for a container will remain an optional field. 
©2014 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved

About the Author


Joan Koenig is counsel in the Customs & Trade team. She possesses substantial experience in international trade regulations, particularly those relating to U.S. export controls (ITAR, EAR, FACR, FTR) and customs regulations. Joan has considerable experience applying U.S. export controls, customs and international trade laws and regulations to various situations and business transactions for both U.S. and non-U.S. companies. She has extensive experience representing clients before administrative agencies involved in international trade, including the U.S. Departments of State, Commerce...


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.