Advertisement

May 21, 2013

Center for Biological Diversity Intends To Sue FWS and DOI Over Failure to Make Endangered Species Act Findings

Up to 25 species of amphibians and reptiles found throughout the southeast United States may be receiving protected status under the Endangered Species Act (the “ESA”)The Center for Biological Diversity (the “Center”), a nonprofit membership organization dedicated to protecting species through legal action and scientific petitions, has informed the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (the “Service”) and the Department of the Interior (“DOI”) that it intends to sue the agencies if they fail to advance the processing of the Center’s petition to have the 25 species listed as protected species. Once listed as “endangered” or “threatened, the species would receive various government protections pursuant to the ESA. These protections limit not only direct impacts to individuals within the species but also impacts to their environments. As such, presence of a listed species within an area can prohibitively limit a property’s development and use potential.

The Center issued formal notice of its intent to sue on May 22, 2012. The notice demands that the Service and DOI make findings pursuant to the ESA regarding the species. In its findings, the agencies may conclude that some or all of the species (1) do not warrant protected status under the ESA, (2) warrant protection, (3) warrant protection but that the promulgation of relevant regulations will require additional time, or (4) that “expeditious progress is being made to add qualified species” and remove others. See 16 U.S.C. 1533(b)(3)(B). If the Service and DOI fail to make any such determination, the Center has threatened to file a citizen suit to protect the 25 species, which include the eastern ribbon snake, the Florida Keys mole skink, the hellbender, the seeping salamander, and the Barbour’s map turtle. The Florida Keys species are viewed by the Center as particularly vulnerable due to the limited geographic range in which these species live and the threat of development on their habitat. Pursuant to the ESA, the Service and the DOI have until July 23, 2012 to make their determination.

©2013 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Co-Chair, National Environmental and Land Development Practice

Kerri L. Barsh practices environmental compliance including permitting, enforcement and litigation, and land use law.  Kerri has represented public and private clients on environmental issues including mold, hazardous waste regulatory and liability matters; wetlands and coastal permitting; air quality permitting; petroleum product contamination; and other compliance and enforcement matters.

305-579-0772

About the Author

Associate

Edward Martos is an associate in the Litigation and Environmental practice groups of Greenberg Traurig's Miami Office.

305-579-0500

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.