Advertisement

May 23, 2013

CFTC Proposes Exemptions for Foreign Regulators

On May 1, 2012, the CFTC voted to issue a Proposed Interpretative Statement regarding the confidentiality and indemnification provisions in the Dodd-Frank Act. The proposed statement is aimed at ensuring that foreign regulators have access to data in Swap Data Repositories (SDRs). Currently, Dodd-Frank requires any regulator—domestic or foreign—seeking access to data in an SDR to agree in writing to abide by certain confidentiality and indemnification requirements. Recognizing the difficulties foreign regulators may have complying with the rule and the importance of SDR data to foreign regulatory schemes, the CFTC determined that it would be unreasonable to apply the confidentiality and indemnification provisions to foreign regulators. Accordingly, the CFTC proposes to interpret CEA Section 21(d) such that its provisions do not apply to SDR data sought by foreign regulators when the SDR is also registered, recognized, or otherwise authorized in the foreign jurisdiction’s regulatory regime and the data has been reported to a registered SDR pursuant to the foreign jurisdiction’s regulatory regime. The CFTC is committed to a cooperative international approach to the registration and regulation of SDRs and intends to continue cooperating with foreign regulators in finalizing related rules.

Public comment will extend for 30 days from the date of publication of the proposed statement in the Federal Register.

© 2013 Schiff Hardin LLP

About the Author

Schiff Hardin is proud to have nationally recognized expertise in securities and futures regulation. In 2010 our practice was nationally ranked by Chambers USA — America's Leading Lawyers for Business in Financial Services Regulation: Broker Dealer (Compliance).

Distinctive and Distinguished Practice

Our securities and futures regulation team is respected throughout the securities and futures industries, and represents a broad range of clients involved in the formation, distribution, trading, advising and transfer of securities and futures products and...

312.258.5500

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.