Advertisement

April 24, 2014

Chancellor Strine Issues Important Decision Validating Board Adoption of Forum Selection Clause in Bylaws

On June 25, 2013, Delaware Chancellor Strine issued a fulsome opinion upholding the power of Delaware boards to amend corporate bylaws to include binding forum selection provisions.1 Chancellor Strine reasoned that there is no statutory bar precluding adoption of forum selection clauses provided the board has been empowered in the certificate of incorporation to adopt bylaws under 8 Del. C. § 109(a). The Chancellor also rejected plaintiffs’ contractual challenge, relying on well-settled principles that the bylaws of a Delaware corporation constitute a binding contract with stockholders.

Although subject to a potential appeal, this opinion validates a significant tool for Delaware corporations seeking to proactively defend against costly multi-forum litigation challenging the internal affairs of the corporation. To date, more than 250 Delaware corporations have adopted forum selection bylaws and we strongly recommend that Delaware boards consider whether adopting such a bylaw makes sense. As many other jurisdictions are guided by Delaware jurisprudence, non-Delaware boards may wish to consider the viability of adopting forum selection clauses in their bylaws as well.


1 Boilermakers Local 154 Retir. Fund, et al. v. Chevron Corp., et al and ICLUB Invest. Partnership v. FedEx Corp., et al. (DE Ct. of Chancery, June 25, 2013) http://courts.delaware.gov/opinions/list.aspx?ag=court%20of%20chancery.

©1994-2014 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

John F. Sylvia, Securities, Litigation, Attorney, Mintz Levin, Law Firm
Member

Jack is Co-chair of the Securities Litigation Practice. He is a seasoned trial lawyer whose clients include public and private corporations, officers, directors, special committees, accountants, mutual funds, portfolio managers, and investment advisors. His practice encompasses all facets of securities and financial fraud litigation, and he has handled complex civil and criminal matters involving insider trading, revenue recognition, high-yield investment schemes, market timing, late trading, options backdating, and auction rate securities. In addition, he frequently represents clients in...

617-348-1820

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intend