May 22, 2012

Changes on the Horizon –Taxation of Carried Interests

Now that health care legislation has been passed, Congress is focusing on tax legislation. One of the topics Congress is focusing on is the tax treatment of carried interests. Congress is proposing significant changes to the tax treatment of carried interests, including the recharacterization of capital gains as ordinary income. Carried interests legislation could be adopted by Memorial Day as part of a bill that would extend a number of expiring tax provisions. We are monitoring this situation closely and will publish additional Client Alerts as more information becomes known.

Carried interests are a popular tool for issuing equity compensation to persons who provide services to limited liability companies and other business entities treated as partnerships for tax purposes. A carried interest is a form of equity that entitles the holder to receive allocations and distributions that are isproportionately greater than the holder’s invested capital. One advantage of a carried interest is that the holder may receive long-term capital gains treatment on sale of the entity’s assets or sale of the carried interest.

The tax treatment of carried interests began to receive attention from Congress back in 2007. Since that time, the House of Representatives has considered different bills that would alter how carried interests are taxed. Based upon draft legislation, Congress is proposing to change the tax treatment of carried interests in the following ways:
 

  • Recharacterizing capital gains as ordinary income.
  • Limiting utilization of losses.
  • Imposing self-employment tax.

Carried interests were a topic of significant discussion during the American Bar Association Section of Taxation’s (ABA) meetings in Washington, D.C. in early May. Now that health care legislation has been passed, Congress is focused on tax legislation. As the ABA’s meetings wound up on May 8th, there was a strong sense that carried interests legislation could be adopted by Memorial Day as part of a bill that would extend a number of expiring tax provisions.

There have been a number of headlines over the last few weeks about developments related to carried interests legislation. The ABA submitted comments to the House Ways & Means and Senate Finance Committees on May 11th. On May 19th, the House indicated that it was considering a floor vote on the extenders bill by the end of the week, although on May 20th House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said that consideration of the legislation would slip until the week of May 24th. Also, in light of the fact that the Senate has never passed carried interests legislation, there is the possibility that debate in the Senate could delay passage of any legislation adopted by the House. Congress is currently scheduled to leave on May 28th and return after June 7th for the Memorial Day recess.

Uncertainty exists about the nature of any legislation. Although speculation exists about whether legislation would include any industry carve-outs, House Ways & Means Committee Chair Sander Levin has made comments indicating that any carve-outs are unlikely. In addition, draft legislation as of May 20th indicated that, in the case of individuals, the recognition of ordinary income in respect of a carried interest would be phased in from the date of enactment throughJanuary 1, 2013.

This article is a periodic publication of Holme Roberts & Owen LLP and should not be construed as legal advice or legal opinion on any specific facts or circumstances, nor is it intended to address specific disclosure or compliance issues that may arise in particular circumstances or provide an exhaustive discussion of the topics discussed herein. The contents are intended for general informational and educational purposes only, and you are urged to consult counsel concerning your particular situation and any specific legal questions you may have.

© 2012 HRO LLP

About the Author

Partner

David B. Strong (“Dave”) is a partner in the Denver office. Dave joined the firm in 2002 and is a member of the federal income, state and local tax group.

Dave advises both corporate and individual clients on the tax aspects of a wide variety of transactions including mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures, restructurings, and venture capital investments. Dave also advises issuers and underwriters on the tax consequences associated with numerous types of debt and equity instruments as well as debt/equity hybrids.

Dave is an active member of the Corporate Tax...

303-866-0263

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.