May 22, 2012

China Revamps Its Outdated Copyright Pledges System

The Chinese State Copyright Bureau recently released a new set of copyright pledges registration rules to replace its current system. The "Measures for Registration of Copyright Pledges" (the "Measures") will become effective on January 1, 2011. Copyrights, like other property rights, can be pledged as a financial security. China has not updated its current copyright pledges registration system since it went into effect on September 23, 1996. The key provisions of the Measures are highlighted below.

Unification of the Issuing Agency 

Under the old system, the State Copyright Bureau had the authority to designate a special agency with the sole responsibility of registering pledges and issuing certificates. The Measures simplified the process by eliminating the intermediary and directly declaring that the State Copyright Bureau is the agency responsible for registering copyright pledges. 

Creation of a Register of Copyright Pledges 

The Measures now require the parties to jointly apply to the State Copyright Bureau to record the pledge in the Register of Copyright Pledges (the “Register”). The registration becomes effective only if it appears in the Register, which is a public record. The Register contains comprehensive information regarding the pledge, including any changes to assignments of the pledge. If a dispute arose between the parties, the information in the Register will prevail as fact, unless either party presents evidence that the information in Register was inaccurately recorded. 

Centralizing Copyright Pledge Registration 

Under China’s current system of pledge registration and the relevant property law provisions, the parties’ pledge contract served as the sole document upon which the registration is effectuated. The Measures streamlined the process so that the contract relating to the pledge must be included as part of the application materials, but the Register plays the central role in determining the effective date of the registration. Having the registration become effective upon entry into the Registry facilitates uniformity and accuracy of information when members of the public search for copyright pledges. 

Copyright © 2012, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.

About the Author

The Shanghai Office is Sheppard Mullin's first overseas office and serves as the center of the Firm’s Asia practices. The Office handles international matters involving not only China but also Hong Kong, Taiwan, Korea, Japan, Singapore, the Philippines, and other markets in the region.

The attorneys and legal consultants in the Office have legal expertise in the corporate, commercial, trade, and disputes fields.  The Office is fully integrated into the Firm’s established practice groups, thus allowing for seamless service across borders and time zones.

For...

86.21.2321.6100

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.