May 22, 2012

China to Solicit Public Opinions On Administration of Enterprise Annuity Funds

The Chinese Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security recently issued the Measures for the Supervision and Administration of Enterprise Annuity Funds (Draft) (“the Draft”) and sought public comments on the Draft. The Draft amended the currently effective Interim Measures for the Administration of Enterprise Annuity Funds in several important respects, as highlighted below:

Investment Composition

The Draft imposed new investment composition requirements for enterprise annuity funds (EAFs). Under the Draft, the upper limit for investment by EAFs in fixed income assets such as fixed deposits, government bonds, and enterprise bonds can be 95% of their portfolios, up from the current 50%, and the lower limit for investment in equities and other liquid assets can be as low as 5%, down from the current 20%.

Fund Governance

The Draft also proposed more stringent provisions with respect to the governance of EAFs. For example, it will be required that the management, supervision, and investment decisions for each EAF be handled separately by different service providers.

Collective Scheme

Recognizing the difficulties medium- and small-sized companies may face in setting up EAFs, the Draft proposed a certain collective scheme for such companies to join. But the proposal appears preliminary and the Draft has yet to lay out a clear picture of how so-called "collectively managed EAFs" might operate.
 

Copyright © 2012, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.

About the Author

The Shanghai Office is Sheppard Mullin's first overseas office and serves as the center of the Firm’s Asia practices. The Office handles international matters involving not only China but also Hong Kong, Taiwan, Korea, Japan, Singapore, the Philippines, and other markets in the region.

The attorneys and legal consultants in the Office have legal expertise in the corporate, commercial, trade, and disputes fields.  The Office is fully integrated into the Firm’s established practice groups, thus allowing for seamless service across borders and time zones.

For...

86.21.2321.6100

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.