Advertisement

April 24, 2014

Chinese Detain Pharmaceutical Company Managers in Economic Crime Probe

This week, reports have arisen that Chinese authorities in the cities of Shanghai, Beijing, and Changsha detained high-level GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) managers as part of an investigation into potential “economic crimes.”   The detentions occurred two weeks after the Wall Street Journal reported that a whistleblower claimed in a disclosure sent to the company’s board that the sales staff in China had engaged in “widespread bribery of doctors” to induce the prescription of GSK’s drugs.

GSK’s international drug promotion activities have been under U.S. government scrutiny for quite a while. As stated in a previous article, pharmaceutical and medical device companies have been the focus of a U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) inquiry since 2010.  Because the DOJ and the SEC consider doctors who are employees of state-owned hospitals and health care organizations to be “foreign officials” under the FCPA, pharmaceutical and medical device companies are particularly at risk for any direct or indirect sales or marketing activities directed at these foreign doctors.  Both agencies are also focused on pharmaceutical companies conducting foreign clinical trials and potentially paying off third-party investigators to finesse research data.

In June 2010, just two months after the DOJ and the SEC announced their pharmaceutical and medical device FCPA industry sweep, the Chinese Ministry of Health (MOH) launched its own nationwide campaign against pharmaceutical industry corruption.  The MOH established a “blacklist” of companies confirmed of paying commercial bribes in connection with the purchase and sale of pharmaceutical products.  The MOH also mandated that local authorities severely punish doctors or other persons who are accepting bribes.  And most recently the MOH has taken steps to lower drug prices, make consultations more expensive, and raise doctors’ salaries to discourage corrupt activities resulting in the overprescribing of drugs and devices.  These reforms are expected to be implemented nationwide by 2015.

Although the circumstances surrounding the Chinese government’s recent arrest of GSK employees are not yet entirely clear, it provides some indication that the MOH’s initiative announced in June 2010 was not merely a paper tiger. The arrests also provide further evidence that enforcement of anti-corruption laws is not limited to U.S. government actions.  Multinational companies operating on foreign soil should understand the potential consequences of alleged violations of foreign anti-bribery laws, regularly assess their risk profile, and update their compliance programs to account for local variations in enforcement standards.

©1994-2014 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Aaron Tidman, White-Collar Crime, Securities, Attorney, Mintz Levin, law firm
Associate

Aaron's practice focuses on white-collar criminal defense, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA") internal investigations and compliance reviews, and securities litigation.  He has extensive experience handling a variety of white-collar matters, including insider trading investigations, corporate governance investigations, Arms Export Control Act investigations, and other financial fraud investigations and enforcement matters brought by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice.

202-434-7392

About the Author

Stephanie Willis, Health Care, Attorney, Mintz Levin, Law Firm
Associate

Stephanie primarily works with health care clients, including clinical laboratories, renal dialysis providers, and hospitals to comply with state and federal laws and regulations governing licensure, reimbursement, health care fraud and abuse, telemedicine, and health information privacy requirements.

She has used her past experience as an Associate Counsel in the Office of the Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services and as an intern at various Massachusetts health care agencies to help clients achieve positive results.

202-434-7437
Paul E. Pelletier, Corporate Attorney, Mintz Levin Law Firm
Member

Paul specializes in representing public and private companies of all sizes and high-profile individuals in state and federal investigations. He represents clients across various industries, including pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device, and financial services. He enjoys a reputation as one of the top white-collar lawyers in the country, recognized for investigating complex international corporate fraud schemes. Paul defends and resolves large, multi-faceted federal and state investigations arising under criminal and civil statutes barring, among other things, the submission...

202-434-7490

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.