Advertisement

May 24, 2013

Churches: Should You Renew that Cell Tower Lease? Not So Fast

As a practicing attorney who represents property owners on cell tower leases, and as the head of the Finance Team at my own church, I am particularly sensitive to churches being approached to extend the term of their existing leases for cell towers or antennas on church property. Churches should view such proposed extensions (or other changes) of their existing leases for existing cell towers with great skepticism. Many existing leases unduly expose a church to risks and prevent the church from getting major rent increases.

When a lease expires, it will cost the cell company approximately $250,000 to move the tower to a different site. So usually both parties come out ahead by agreeing to a renewal but with a large rent increase. By agreeing to an early extension (or any amendment that extends the term of the lease), churches are usually foregoing the renewal and related large rent increase.

And churches are being approached for extensions five, ten and even fifteen years before a lease expires! This illustrates how important extensions are to the cell industry. Often the extension is "packaged" with amendments modifying other lease terms and a small (2-4%) rent increase.

The cell companies have well-developed programs to make these types of extensions sound innocuous. The unfortunate result is that they often get approved without the detailed scrutiny they deserve.

Many existing leases unduly expose a church to risks. For example, leases often make the cellular antenna the main or primary use of the property with the church's use secondary. As a result, churches may have to pay a huge sum to relocate a cell tower if the tower or antenna is in the way of a church's proposed building expansion, or if the church remodels or renovates and the resulting change blocks cell signals from a certain direction.

Leases often lack adequate insurance or indemnity provisions to protect the church from liability during the many decades a lease is in effect. More generally, typical leases are unduly "one sided" in favor of the provider and do not adequately protect the church. At minimum, a lease extension or amendment provides the opportunity to correct some of the preceding problems.

© 2013 Varnum LLP

About the Author

Partner

John is co-chair of the firm’s Cable and Telecommunications Practice Group. He focuses on representing municipalities nationwide on cable and telecommunications matters including the grant, renewal and transfer of cable franchises, Wi-Fi and Wi-Max (wireless) agreements, telecommunications matters, right of way matters, cellular tower zoning, cell tower leasing and FCC proceedings. He has worked with over 200 communities in 15 states on such matters. He also represents municipal and cooperative utilities and...

616/336-6725

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.