Advertisement

May 22, 2013

Climate for Formaldehyde Exposure Product Liability Litigation Intensifies

Formaldehyde is a colorless, strong-smelling gas often found in aqueous (water-based) solutions. Formaldehyde in the United States is used for many industrial applications – including in plastics and resin manufacture (e.g., particle board), in adhesives, and in resins used in a variety of applications where they can replace metals in mechanical working parts (e.g., automobiles, trucks, consumer articles, plumbing, industrial machinery, and appliances).

Recently, several groups have announced links between formaldehyde exposure and cancer.  For example, in June 2012, IARC announced that it would classify diesel engine exhaust as Group 1, carcinogenic to humans. Diesel engine exhaust contains a number of compounds, including formaldehyde.

Despite the weaknesses in the analyses classifying formaldehyde as a carcinogen, it seems likely that the current climate will intensify, which could bring even stricter scrutiny with respect to potential occupational exposure to formaldehyde and additional adverse publicity regarding formaldehyde-containing products. Companies with products that utilize or contain ormaldehyde can likely expect that litigation related to allegations of injury from formaldehyde exposure will only increase in the future.

Formaldehyde is also a normal metabolite of the human body. An adult human body normally produces and metabolizes (detoxifies or utilizes) over 50,000 milligrams of endogenous formaldehyde per day. Because free formaldehyde can diffuse from tissues in the upper respiratory tract into exhaled air, minute amounts of formaldehyde can also be detected in the breath. Formaldehyde exposure can occur dermally, through inhalation, or by ingestion.

In the 1980s and 1990s, a number of epidemiological studies were conducted on industrial workers and other professionals occupationally exposed to formaldehyde over the course of their careers. Several of these studies found a link between formaldehyde exposure and certain kinds of cancer, including nasopharyngeal and nasal cancer. Several recent studies also have found increased risks for leukemia among groups exposed to formaldehyde. Criticisms of these studies have been extensive and include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Limited information about subjects’ exposure levels and few measurements taken to assess their exposure levels;
  • Comparison between high and low level formaldehyde exposure groups, rather than exposed and unexposed (control) groups;
  • Limited information about leukemia subtypes;
  • Failure to conclude whether the outcome was the result of a causal relationship between formaldehyde exposure and cancer or whether it was the result of chance; and
  • Utilizing studies with a wide range of formaldehyde exposure levels and a corresponding wide range of risk  estimates in conducting a meta-analysis, resulting in a potentially unreliable summary risk estimate for the meta-analysis.

These publications appear to have influenced recent assessments of the carcinogenicity of formaldehyde. On June 2, 2010, the EPA released a 1043-page draft of its Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) assessment entitled Toxicological Review of Formaldehyde Inhalation Toxicity ("IRIS Formaldehyde Draft"). The IRIS Formaldehyde Draft concluded that "the human epidemiologic evidence is sufficient to conclude that there is a causal association between formaldehyde exposure and mortality from myeloid leukemia."

In June 2011, the National Toxicology Program (NTP) 12th Report on Carcinogens (ROC) was published classifying formaldehyde as Group 1, carcinogenic to humans. The ROC lists nasopharyngeal cancer, sinonasal cancer, and lymphohematopoietic (LHP) cancer as being causally linked to formaldehyde exposure and states that links between formaldehyde exposure and certain types of cancers, including nasopharyngeal cancer, sinonasal cancer, and LHP cancers, "cannot be explained by chance, bias, or confounding." However, the ROC observes that "[t]he mechanisms by which formaldehyde causes toxicity at distal sites are unknown" but refers to the recent publications linking cancer with formaldehyde exposure.

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) monograph for formaldehyde, published in Volume 100F (2012), classifies formaldehyde as Group 1, carcinogenic to humans.  Prior to October 2009, formaldehyde had been classified as Group 2A, meaning that it was a probable human carcinogen. 

However, these classifications of formaldehyde have been subject to widespread scrutiny based on weaknesses in the studies upon which they base their conclusions. For example, the American Chemistry Council has observed that the EPA’s proposed cancer risk value of 0.008 parts per billion for formaldehyde in the IRIS would suggest that human breath (which contains <0.8 to 8 parts per billion of formaldehyde) poses an unacceptable risk of cancer, which presumably cannot be accurate.

© 2013 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

About the Author

Partner

Joseph G. Eaton is a partner in the Indianapolis, Indiana office of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. He is vice chairperson and co-administrator in the Litigation Department and chair of the firm’s Toxic Tort Practice Group.

Mr. Eaton has represented chemical, petroleum and industrial manufacturers in complex litigation throughout the United States. He concentrates his practice in litigating matters involving chemical product liability actions, including plaintiffs’ personal injury and property damage litigation relating to alleged toxic products. He presently...

317-231-7705

About the Author

Associate

Jennifer Schuster is an associate in Barnes & Thornburg LLP’s Indianapolis, Indiana office, where she is a member of the firm’s Litigation and Intellectual Property Law Departments.

Ms. Schuster completed her undergraduate and graduate work at Purdue University, where she was a recipient of the Steven C. Beering Scholarship and Fellowship. She received her B.S. in molecular biology with honors in research and B.A. in creative writing in 2004, both with highest distinction, and her M.S. in genetics in 2005. While at Purdue, she was selected as an outstanding senior in...

317-231-6467

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.