May 22, 2012

CMS Actuary Projects Savings Potential For ACOs

Between 2005 and 2008, Medicare tested the shared savings model in a demonstration project with 10 of the nation’s most integrated large group physician practices. The groups set out to implement 32 quality measures generally thought to achieve better clinical outcomes (such as routine eye and foot exams for diabetics and follow up to make sure patients were taking blood pressure and cholesterol medications) to determine whether doing so would also lower costs.  If the groups improved performance on the measures each year and held their costs below other Medicare providers in their regions, they would receive 80 percent of Medicare’s savings. 

By the end of the third year, all ten groups had achieved benchmarks for 28 of the quality measures. However, only five groups qualified to share in the collective savings of $32 million to Medicare by lowering costs.

Now, Medicare is trying the same model again in a three-year experiment known as Accountable Care Organizations. However, this time there is a two-track model that allows a group practice participant that achieves the performance measures to either share a percentage of savings only or to share a greater percentage of savings if the group also agrees to bear a share of cost overruns.

In the ACO final rule published in the Nov. 2, 2011 Federal Register (76 FR at 67964), the CMS Office of the Actuary (Actuary) predicts that between 50 and 270 group practices will participate and serve between 1 and 5 million of Medicare’s approximately 47 million current beneficiaries.  The Actuary estimates these groups will collectively generate $470 million in savings over four years – a savings per beneficiary of between $24 to $118 per year.

The $470 million estimate is based on the “median” from 5000 computer simulations the Actuary conducted. The simulations found that savings could range as high as $2 billion (between $100 and $500 per beneficiary per year) or costs could actually increase by $1.1 billion over the same four years. 

© 2012 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

About the Author

Partner

J. Michael Grubbs is a partner in the Healthcare Department. He serves as administrator of the department for the Indianapolis, Indiana office. His practice includes representation of healthcare providers before state and federal healthcare regulatory agencies and in related litigation matters. His work also includes resolution of reimbursement and regulatory compliance issues as well as structuring or restructuring ventures and transactions to avoid problems before they arise.

317-231-7224

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.