May 22, 2012

CMS Grants The Joint Commission Extension on Compliance with Telemedicine Standards

Because the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has not yet published final regulations on telemedicine, it has allowed The Joint Commission (TJC) to delay changes to its telemedicine standards until July 1, 2011.  The TJC’s current telemedicine standards are in conflict with the Medicare Conditions of Participation, which do not allow for credentialing by proxy.   The proposed rule issued by CMS last year would permit credentialing by proxy between CMS-accredited hospitals.

TJC issued the following statement:

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has not yet published its new telehealth regulations, which it had expected to do by March 1, 2011. Therefore, CMS has now notified The Joint Commission that it has an extension to July 1, 2011 before The Joint Commission will need to alter its telehealth standards to comply with CMS telehealth regulations. Our hope is that the new regulation will modify existing CMS standards in this area to be more in keeping with Joint Commission requirements. CMS expects to publish its telehealth regulations shortly and when it does, The Joint Commission will make changes to its standards in accordance with the regulation and will notify its accredited hospitals and critical access hospitals of the timeframe expected for implementation of the new CMS regulations.

As background on this issue, since September 2009, The Joint Commission has engaged CMS and members of Congress regarding the issue of credentialing and privileging by proxy as it relates to telemedicine providers and users. The Joint Commission took the position that there would be an adverse affect on the access to some telehealth services if organizations were not allowed to comply with Joint Commission requirements addressing credentialing and privileging by proxy. The Joint Commission’s position has been that the CMS requirements place an undue burden on many organizations without improving the quality of services, provider accountability and the effectiveness of the credentialing and privileging processes.

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.