May 22, 2012

CMS Publishes Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Program Final Rule

As part of the stimulus package known as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) established an incentive program for the adoption of electronic health record (EHR) technology, as a means to promote greater efficiency in the delivery of health care and improve the quality of care.  In total, HITECH makes available more than $27 billion to providers who qualify for incentive payments.

Under the EHR incentive program, a qualifying physician or other eligible professional (EP) who demonstrates "meaningful use" of certified EHR technology may be eligible for up to $48,400 in Medicare incentive payments over five years, or up to $63,750 in Medicaid incentive payments over six years.  An eligible hospital or eligible critical access hospital (CAH) that demonstrates meaningful use may be eligible for an initial incentive payment of $2,000,000, plus additional incentive payments (based upon the number of discharges and other factors) over a period of up to four years.

On July 28, 2010, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) published a final rule (the "Final Rule"), which established a "two-track" approach to the minimum requirements physicians, hospitals and other providers must meet to demonstrate "meaningful use" of certified EHR technology in order to qualify for incentive payments during the first two years of the program.  Under the Final Rule, to demonstrate "meaningful use" of EHR technology, EPs, hospitals and CAHs will need to satisfy each of 15 (for EPs) or 14 (for hospitals and CAHs) "core" objectives.  In addition, EPs, hospitals and CAHs will need to satisfy at least 5 of 10 (for EPs) or 5 of 9 (for hospitals and CAHs) so-called "menu" objectives, as set forth on the following pages:1

EPs and eligible hospitals and CAHs must demonstrate satisfaction of each of the following "core set" objectives:

Core Set Objectives – Eligible Professionals

  1. Computerized physician order entry (CPOE)

  2. E-Prescribing (eRx)

  3. Report ambulatory clinical quality measures to CMS/States

  4. Implement one clinical decision support rule

  5. Provide patients with an electronic copy of their health information, upon request

  6. Provide clinical summaries for patients for each office visit

  7. Drug-drug and drug-allergy interaction checks

  8. Record demographics

  9. Maintain an up-to-date problem list of current and active diagnoses

  10. Maintain active medication list

  11. Maintain active medication allergy list

  12. Record and chart changes in vital signs

  13. Record smoking status for patients 13 years or older

  14. Capability to exchange key clinical information among providers of care and patient-authorized entities electronically

  15. Protect electronic health information

 Core Set Objectives – Eligible Hospitals and Critical Access Hospitals

  1. CPOE

  2. Drug-drug and drug-allergy interaction checks

  3.  Record demographics

  4. Implement one clinical decision support rule

  5. Maintain an up-to-date problem list of current and active diagnoses

  6. Maintain active medication list

  7. Maintain active medication allergy list

  8. Record and chart changes in vital signs

  9. Record smoking status for patients 13 years or older

  10. Report hospital clinical quality measures to CMS or States

  11. Provide patients with an electronic copy of their health information, upon request

  12. Provide patients with an electronic copy of their discharge instructions at time of discharge, upon request

  13. Capability to exchange key clinical information among providers of care and patient-authorized entities electronically

  14. Protect electronic health information

EPs and eligible hospitals and CAHs must demonstrate satisfaction of at least five (5) of the following "menu set" objectives (but including at least one of the "public health objectives" denoted by an asterisk):

Menu Set Objectives – Eligible Professionals

  1. Drug-formulary checks

  2. Incorporate clinical lab test results as structured data

  3. Generate lists of patients by specific conditions

  4. Send reminders to patients per patient preference for preventive/follow-up care

  5. Provide patients with timely electronic access to their health information

  6. Use certified EHR technology to identify patient-specific education resources and provide to patient, if appropriate

  7. Medication reconciliation

  8. Summary of care record for each transition of care/referrals

  9. Capability to submit electronic data to immunization registries/systems*

  10. Capability to provide electronic syndromic surveillance data to public health agencies*

Menu Set Objectives – Eligible Hospitals and Critical Access Hospitals

  1. Record advanced directives for patients 65 years or older

  2. Incorporate clinical lab test results as structured data

  3. Generate lists of patients by specific conditions

  4. Use certified EHR technology to identify patient-specific education resources and provide to patient, if appropriate

  5. Medication reconciliation

  6. Summary of care record for each transition of care/referrals

  7. Capability to submit electronic data to immunization registries/systems*

  8. Capability to provide electronic submission of reportable lab results to public health agencies*

  9. Capability to provide electronic syndromic surveillance data to public health agencies*

According to CMS, the approach established under the Final Rule will ensure that the most basic elements of meaningful EHR use will be met by all EPs and eligible hospitals and CAHs, but also provide flexibility in achieving and demonstrating meaningful use of certified EHR technology.

The Final Rule, which will become effective on September 26, 2010, is available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-17207.pdf.


1 Table adapted from the program materials from a July 22, 2010 CMS training program, "EHR Incentive Programs and Meaningful Use Final Rule," available at https://www.cms.gov/EHRIncentivePrograms/Downloads/EHR_Incentive_Program...

© 2012 Vedder Price

About the Author

Shareholder

Richard H. Sanders is a shareholder at Vedder Price P.C. and has provided legal counsel to a broad range of health care providers, including health care systems, hospitals, physicians, provider networks and managed care organizations, regarding corporate, governance, regulatory and transactional issues, including tax, reimbursement and antitrust implications of structural changes, affiliations and hospital-physician and managed care relationships.

312-609-7644

About the Author

Associate

Nicholas S. Harned is a member of the firm’s Health Care, Health Care Finance and Finance and Transactions Groups.  A significant portion of Mr. Harned’s practice involves representing lenders in financing transactions with health care entities.  Mr. Harned also counsels health care clients on all aspects of health care law, including regulatory compliance matters such as federal and state anti-kickback and self-referral laws, HIPAA compliance, and Medicare and Medicaid certification and reimbursement issues.  Mr. Harned also has significant experience...

312-609-7870

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.