Advertisement

May 18, 2013

CMS To Pay Hospitals Over $3 Billion for CMS’ Miscalculation

Hospital chains Hospital Corporation of America (HCA) and Tenet Healthcare Corporation (Tenet) announced on April 12th that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has admitted that it erroneously calculated the rural floor provision established by the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. According to the HCA press release:

[T]he rural floor provision establishes that a] urban hospital’s wage index within a particular state could not be lower than the statewide rural wage index. The wage index reflects the relative hospital wage level compared to the applicable average hospital wage level. . . [T]his provision [is] budget neutral, meaning that total wage index payments nationwide before and after the implementation of this provision must remain the same. To accomplish this, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) was required to increase the wage index for all affected urban hospitals, and to then calculate a rural floor budget neutrality adjustment (RFBNA) to reduce other wage indexes in order to maintain the same level of payments.

According to a Los Angeles Times article, the erroneous payments could amount to over $3 billion dollars in additional payments to over 2,200 hospitals.  Here is a partial list of the hospitals that have announced their settlements with CMS related to this matter and the amounts that they anticipate receiving from the agency:

  • HCA – $271 million
  • Tenet - $84 million
  • Long Beach Memorial Center - $6 million
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center – $14.3 million

A Modern Healthcare article, in questioning a CMS official, stated that the settlement comes after a ruling from the DC Circuit Court of Appeals finding that ”CMS incorrectly applied the law’s budget-neutrality requirement to hospital’s rural wage index from fiscal 1999 to fiscal 2011″ in a related case: Cape Cod Hospital et al. v. Sebelius and U.S. Department of Health & Human Services

©1994-2013 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Associate

Stephanie is an Associate in the Washington, D.C. office, practicing in the Health Law Section.

Prior to joining Mintz Levin, Stephanie was an associate counsel in the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Counsel to the Inspector General. There, her practice focused on health care enforcement matters involving the False Claims Act, the Social Security Act, the Physician Self-Referral Act, the anti-kickback statute, the EMTALA, and other administrative actions.

(202) 434-7437

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.