Advertisement

June 19, 2013

Commission Orders BPA to Provide Comparable Transmission Access

On December 7, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) used its authority under Section 211A of the Federal Power Act to direct Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) to submit a revised Open Access Transmission Tariff (OATT) that, according to the Commission, will provide "comparable transmission service that is not unduly discriminatory or preferential." Section 211A, added to the Federal Power Act by the Energy Policy Act of 2005, grants the Commission the discretion to require unregulated transmission utilities to provide comparable, nondiscriminatory, open access to their transmission systems similar to the requirements imposed on jurisdictional public utilities. The order will have a significant impact on nonjurisdictional transmission providers' reciprocity OATTs and may influence how these entities comply with the regional planning obligations of Order No. 1000.

The Commission's order was the result of a complaint filed by a group of wind developers in the Pacific Northwest, alleging that BPA uses its environmental redispatch policy to curtail wind generators in an unduly discriminatory manner. Under the policy, BPA issues dispatch orders to curtail generation and uses the firm transmission rights associated with the wind generation output to deliver federal hydropower to the wind generators' customers. The environmental redispatch policy also provides that BPA will not pay negative prices during environmental redispatch. BPA unilaterally amended its large generator interconnection agreements to reference the policy, requiring all generators with an interconnection agreement to comply with BPA's redispatch orders and reduce generation when ordered to do so.

Despite BPA's contention that challenges to its environmental redispatch policy are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Ninth Circuit, the Commission determined it was appropriate for it to act under Section 211A because BPA's environmental redispatch policy significantly diminishes open access to transmission and permits BPA to provide transmission service to others on terms and conditions that were not comparable to those it provides itself. BPA's ability to order generators to reduce generation interrupts the transmission service obtained by customers in order to deliver federal hydropower from BPA's system. Additionally, according to the Commission, the environmental redispatch policy harms load-serving entities by curtailing generation from renewable resources that would have been eligible to help satisfy state renewable portfolio standard requirements. As a result, the Commission ordered BPA to file tariff revisions within 90 days addressing the comparability concerns and providing transmission service on terms and conditions that are not unduly discriminatory or preferential.

Copyright © 2013 by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Partner

John D. McGrane is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Energy Practice. Mr. McGrane has more than 30 years of experience representing electric utilities and other participants in the electric power industry. He is listed in Chambers USA: America's Leading Lawyers for Business, Chambers Global: The World’s Leading Lawyers, and The Best Lawyers in America as one of America's leading energy attorneys.

202-739-5621

About the Author

Partner

Stephen M. Spina is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Energy Practice. Mr. Spina represents electric utilities and other electric industry participants before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on a variety of matters, including industry restructuring, market investigations, and regulatory issues under the Federal Power Act.

202-739-5958

Contributors

Partner

Glen S. Bernstein is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Energy Practice. Mr. Bernstein represents clients in all aspects of electric utility regulation and deregulation, with an emphasis on transmission and interconnection access, rates, and planning; independent transmission providers; electricity markets; and compliance with Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Standards of Conduct and Codes of Conduct, affiliate transaction rules, and antimarket manipulation rules.

202.739.5994

About the Author

Associate

Pamela C. Tsang is an associate in Morgan Lewis's Energy Practice. Attorneys in this practice counsel clients in the electric, nuclear, oil, gas, and water industries on a broad range of energy issues. We offer clients advice on domestic and international energy regulations and represent them in arbitration, in high-stakes regulatory and commercial disputes, and in litigation before state and federal courts. Our Energy Practice provides an array of services-transactional, counseling, regulatory, and litigation-to address all of our energy clients' legal needs.

202.739.5199

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Co