May 22, 2012

Commissioned Salespersons No Longer Exempt From Overtime Under New Jersey Law?

In an attempt to create more consistency between New Jersey law and federal law, the New Jersey Department of Labor (NJDOL) recently amended its wage and hour regulations to adopt the federal Fair Labor Standards Act’s (FLSA or Act) white collar exemptions from minimum wage and overtime requirements.  What was anticipated to be a welcome change for employers has quickly become a source of frustration.  The upside is that employers can now rely on one common set of rules in classifying employees for overtime purposes under both federal and New Jersey law.  The downside is that the amendments have inadvertently eliminated a key exemption previously available to New Jersey employers; the commissioned salesperson exemption.

The amended New Jersey regulation expressly adopts the federal provisions of 29 CFR Part 541.  However, the FLSA exemptions listed in Part 541, known as the “white collar” exemptions, include only the administrative, executive, professional, and outside sales exemptions.  Conspicuously absent from Section 541 is the FLSA’s version of the commissioned salesperson exemption, which is set forth separately, in Section 7(i) of the Act.

New Jersey’s regulations previously contained a commissioned salesperson exemption which allowed employers to exempt from overtime any “employee whose primary duty consists of sales activity and who receives at least 50 percent of his or her total compensation from commissions and a total compensation of not less than $400.00 per week.”   This exemption has been relied on by countless employers in classifying qualifying sales persons as exempt from overtime.  However, because the newly amended regulations do not adopt Section 7(i) of the FLSA, New Jersey law as it currently stands does not recognize any commissioned salesperson exemption from minimum and overtime requirements.

The result: New Jersey employers who have properly classified employees as exempt under the commissioned salesperson exemption in the past must now reconsider these employees’ exempt status.  While the omission of Section 7(i) from the amended regulations appears to have been a mistake, New Jersey employers who continue to rely on the commissioned salesperson exemption run the risk of violating New Jersey’s current minimum wage and overtime provisions. 

© 2012 Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, P.C. All Rights Reserved

About the Author

Associate

Ms. Somerset focuses her practice on the representation of management in employment litigation matters with an emphasis on defense primarily against claims of alleged wrongful discharge, discrimination, harassment, retaliation, wage-and-hour violations and whistle-blowing. Ms. Somerset counsels employers with regard to workplace policies and manuals, and general litigation avoidance. She also has experience in assisting clients in the area of general corporate matters.

732-741-3900

About the Author

Shareholder

Mr. DeBlasio has devoted his entire career exclusively to the representation of management in all aspects of labor and employment-related matters. He specializes in defending against claims of alleged wrongful discharge, discrimination, harassment, retaliation, wage-and-hour violations and whistle-blowing. He represents employers in all labor and employment and benefits-related matters such as employment-related litigation in federal and state courts and administrative agencies; jury trials; negotiation and enforcement of employment agreements and restrictive covenants; labor-injunction...

732-741-3900

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.